Main Entry: sub·ter·fuge Pronunciation: 's&b-t&r-"fyüj Function: noun Etymology: Late Latin subterfugium, from Latin subterfugere to escape, evade, from subter- secretly (from subter underneath; akin to Latin sub under) + fugere to flee -- more at UP, FUGITIVE
1 : deception by artifice or stratagem in order to conceal, escape, or evade 2 : a deceptive device or stratagem at http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=subterfuge UncoolRabbit, you're still evading the need to provide a genuine response to a direct question to you: What cause justifies violating an innocent person's right to be free from YOU initiating, or doing a credible threat to initiate, physical force against their body and/or justly held possessions? Your expression of garbled logic below is not going to distract the smart folk in this forum; how about an answer dude... -Terry Liberty Parker http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian --- In [email protected], "uncoolrabbit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It's a rediculous statement, the problem is not getting me to admit > that it is as much. The problem, wich I am sure is not yours, is > getting Terry to admit that his is similarly rediculous. I doubt I > have the mastery of words to convince either of you of that. > > One who will accept some now, and work for more later, is not some > evil agressor bent on decieving and controlling you. They have a > valid point of view that all or nothing is not the best way. In > practice Terry might understand that, but his constant posting of > this little blurb is a constant assault and those with a different > point of view. In a very real way it is that inapropriate personal > attack that will get your posts moderated though terry is the > moderator. One who speaks a different point of view, becasue it is > there genuine point of view, and asks only to be heard, and does not > judge your differing point of view is NOT an agressor. The same can > not be said for one who would demonize he who thinks differently. > > --- In [email protected], "mark robert" <colowe@> wrote: > > > > Assuming you are being serious, where is your evidence of > > "violation" and "aggression" from those who "promote unlimited > > Libertarianism"? If you can't provide any, at least supply a > > theoretical example of what you are talking about. Or maybe you > > didn't write that yourself? > > > > > > > > > > > > ************ > > {American jurors have complete Constitutional authority to vote > > "not guilty" based on nothing more than a disagreement with the > > case, no matter the evidence - despite the judge's instructions. > > There is absolutely no obligation to vote "guilty" to arrive at a > > unanimous verdict. Get on a jury, stand your ground, and fulfill > > its other main purpose: to counteract abusive government and > > unjust lawsuits. > > See www.fija.org > > [Please adopt this as your own signature.] } > > > > > > > > > > _____ > > > > > > > > 'Freedom' to violate you and yours > > is at the heart of UNLIMITED 'libertarianism' > > > > In an apparent attempt to impose > > the continuing philosophic idealogy > > of extreem libertarianism, there is a push > > to demonize the pragmatists who seek real change. > > Now that the comfortable obscurity of Libertariansm > > has essentially fallen, the banner of 'liberty' becomes > > a hijacking target of the 'consistant libertarians.' Aggressors > > who > > eagerly want to maintain that only they know what truely is > > 'liberty' > > with no 'exceptions' to what they want to see construed as THE > > UNIVERSAL view of libertarianism. > > > > > > Don't hate me Terry :) > > > > > > > > > > > > _____ > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
