One of the main things I keep harping out because I think it is so 
important to the advancement of liberty if libertarians  are going to 
even bother running for  voting, running for office and endorseing 
people to run for office. That idea is that political office is power 
and that politicans must not set the agenda. Even if reformers go 
their own way reduced the strictness of the platform or pledge by 
either taking over the Lp or starting a new party, it would be unwise 
of them if they care anything about liberty for their family to let 
the politicans set the agenda, to not have standards that the 
politicans must follow. In other word don't be a fool and trust the 
politicans that much, this aint some game.--- In 
[email protected], "Cory Nott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There are many different types of Christianity. Some Christians 
believe in a
> literal interpretation of the Bible. Some do interpret yet believe 
in the
> Trinity. Some don't believe in the Trinity but still believe in the
> Resurrection and various miracles and yet still others believe that 
Jesus
> was just a man who was exemplary and worth imitating.
> 
> Though I follow the NAP for moral reasons and reasons of principle, 
I
> realize that each person who claims to be Libertarian may approach 
to a
> degree that is less or more than I would approve personally. I'm 
happy to
> let these people in the party in the hopes that they can be 
convinced that
> there is always another worthwhile step toward liberty to be taken.
> 
> 
>   -----Original Message-----
>   From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Behalf Of Paul
>   Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 11:07 AM
>   To: [email protected]
>   Subject: [Libertarian] Re: Libertarian National Committee
> 
> 
>   It's not a matter of excluding people who don't agree 100%.  It's 
a
>   matter of excluding people who don't buy into the core belief of
>   libertarianism.
> 
>   It is absolutely no different in any way from a church
>   ex-communicating someone whose beliefs are contrary to theirs.  
The
>   comments of those who defend inclusion of these people who 
advocate
>   un-libertarian/pro-war stances are as laughable as someone 
saying...
> 
>   "I'm a big tent Christian.  Why can't we have Satan worshipers in 
our
>   congregation?  How can we grow as a religion if we don't allow 
those
>   who believe the exact opposite of us to be in our church?  Some 
of us
>   believe in Jesus, and some believe in Satan.  We can't fault them 
just
>   because they want to sacrifice human beings on an altar in our 
church.
>   They believe in 99% of the other things right?"
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>






ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian  
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to