he is the most honorable. He refuses to run as a Libertarian, even
though he is comfortably ensconced in his House seat, and has been for
years. That speaks volumes in and of itself. He would easily, on his
popularity with his constituency and the fact that he is a long time
incumbant, win as a Libertarian - and it would be a boon to the Party
too. Then again, I think, if he isn't truly a Libertarian, then I
don't want to compromise our values. If he was a Libertarian, he
wouldn't be a member of the GOP. Political expediency and convenience
is no excuse to compromise one's values, and by running as a
Republican he has done just that!
--- In [email protected], "Geof Gibson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "Edward J. Williamson"
> <ejohnwilliamson@> wrote:
> >
> > Again, here we go with the Republican Libertarian fallacy again,
> > along with the litany of libertarian labels. There are no
> libertarian ...
>
> Does that mean Ron Paul is not a Libertrian? I know what party he's
> run under, but does that mean his philosophy is not Libertarian?
>
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "Libertarian" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
