It quotes the entire article, rather than a selected part
sufficiently large and representative to let the recipient know if
the whole article is worth reading.
It doesn't contain a link directly to the article itself, apparently.
It doesn't have any commentary from the poster explaining why the
article is important: it's entirely true and very relevant, it's
entirely false and very relevant, it is a mixture of truth and
falsehood and very relevant, it is inflammatory and irrelevant and
therefore a worse than useless distraction, some other. Nothing.
Basically, it's like a message posted by a newbie on a bulletin
board system, circa 1990.
And that's without even considering the content. Which is dreck.
It's full of "planted axioms" and assumed conclusions, some are
quite blatantly false, while others are merely opinions that I find
absolutely absurd.
I'd detail them, or at least a sample, but perhaps someone else will
do so, and spare me the chore. -Eric
--- In [email protected], "Victor Bozzo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
[snipped: the extremely silly article]
http://charliedavis.blogspot.com.
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "Libertarian" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
