-TLP
--- In [email protected], "mark robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> John,
>
> That's the point. An apology with an excuse is less like an
> apology and more like another violation, no matter to whom it is
> directed.
>
> -Mark
>
>
>
> ************
> {American jurors have complete Constitutional authority to vote
> "not guilty" based on nothing more than a disagreement with the
> case, no matter the evidence - despite the judge's instructions.
> There is absolutely no obligation to vote "guilty" to arrive at a
> unanimous verdict. Get on a jury, stand your ground, and fulfill
> its other main purpose: to counteract abusive government and
> unjust lawsuits.
> See www.fija.org
> [Please adopt this as your own signature.] }
>
> ---------------------
>
>
>
> > John,
> >
> > An apology that kinda re-blames your original victim (affecting
> > you "that way") is less than an apology. In fact, it is
> somewhat
> > of a re-commission of the original ad hominem.
> >
> > -Mark
>
> True, but I am not apologizing to the victim, nor would I. I am
> apologizing
> to the rest of you who caught me with my pants down.
>
> John Wayne
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
SPONSORED LINKS
| Libertarian | English language | Political parties |
| Online dictionary | American politics |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "Libertarian" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
