mark robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > John, > > Sorry, I have done that and have not come up with sufficient > clarity. > > Let's review: > In a context of claiming our country is in danger you blamed the > weakening of environmental (and other) laws. I disagreed and > explained that such laws are responsible for creating and > supporting big-government and big-oppression. I will elaborate > that since such laws serve to greatly enhance govt power and > oppression, the danger would much more likely come from the > opposite of your claim.
as an example of that a few years back a dance party was taken by police to the land and enviroment court and was blocked on the grounds it would do damage to the native area, which was a cow paddock. I still trying to work out what "damage" can be done to a cow paddock that cows cant do themselves... shrug. enviromental grounds are frequently used to block developments. one would think that birds are more important then housing people, and are incapable of moving on to green pastures when the dozers move in. Vic ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Check out the new improvements in Yahoo! Groups email. http://us.click.yahoo.com/6pRQfA/fOaOAA/yQLSAA/KlSolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
