The Only Path To Tomorrow 

Ayn Rand 




Readers Digest, January 1944, pp. 88-90 

The greatest threat to mankind and civilization is the spread of the 
totalitarian philosophy. Its best ally is not the devotion of its 
followers but the confusion of its enemies. To fight it, we must 
understand it. 

Totalitarianism is collectivism. Collectivism means the subjugation 
of the individual to a group — whether to a race, class or state does 
not matter. Collectivism holds that man must be chained to collective 
action and collective thought for the sake of what is called ``the 
common good.´´ 

Throughout history, no tyrant ever rose to power except on the claim 
of representing ``the common good.´´ Napoleon ``served the common 
good´´ of France. Hitler is ``serving the common good´´ of Germany. 
Horrors which no man would dare consider for his own selfish sake are 
perpetrated with a clear conscience by ``altruists´´ who justify 
themselves by-the common good. 

No tyrant has ever lasted long by force of arms alone. Men have been 
enslaved primarily by spiritual weapons. And the greatest of these is 
the collectivist doctrine that the supremacy of the state over the 
individual constitutes the common good. No dictator could rise if men 
held as a sacred faith the conviction that they have inalienable 
rights of which they cannot be deprived for any cause whatsoever, by 
any man whatsoever, neither by evildoer nor supposed benefactor. 

This is the basic tenet of individualism, as opposed to collectivism. 
Individualism holds that man is an independent entity with an 
inalienable right to the pursuit of his own happiness in a society 
where men deal with one another as equals. 

The American system is founded on individualism. If it is to survive, 
we must understand the principles of individualism and hold them as 
our standard in any public question, in every issue we face. We must 
have a positive credo, a clear consistent faith. 

We must learn to reject as total evil the conception that the common 
good is served by the abolition of individual rights. General 
happiness cannot be created out of general suffering and self-
immolation. The only happy society is one of happy individuals. One 
cannot have a healthy forest made up of rotten trees. 

The power of society must always be limited by the basic, inalienable 
rights of the individual. 

The right of liberty means man's right to individual action, 
individual choice, individual initiative and individual property. 
Without the right to private property no independent action is 
possible. 

The right to the pursuit of happiness means man's right to live for 
himself, to choose what constitutes his own, private, personal 
happiness and to work for its achievement. Each individual is the 
sole and final judge in this choice. A man's happiness cannot be 
prescribed to him by another man or by any number of other men. 

These rights are the unconditional, personal, private, individual 
possession of every man, granted to him by the fact of his birth and 
requiring no other sanction. Such was the conception of the founders 
of our country, who placed individual rights above any and all 
collective claims. Society can only be a traffic policeman in the 
intercourse of men with one another. 

>From the beginning of history, two antagonists have stood face to 
face, two opposite types of men: the Active and the Passive. The 
Active Man is the producer, the creator, the originator, the 
individualist. His basic need is independence — in order to think and 
work. He neither needs nor seeks power over other men — nor can he be 
made to work under any form of compulsion. Every type of good work — 
from laying bricks to writing a symphony — is done by the Active Man. 
Degrees of human ability vary, but the basic principle remains the 
same: the degree of a man's independence and initiative determines 
his talent as a worker and his worth as a man. 

The Passive Man is found on every level of society, in mansions and 
in slums, and his identification mark is his dread of independence. 
He is a parasite who expects to be taken care of by others, who 
wishes to be given directives, to obey, to submit, to be regulated, 
to be told. He welcomes collectivism, which eliminates any chance 
that he might have to think or act on his own initiative. 

When a society is based on the needs of the Passive Man it destroys 
the Active; but when the Active is destroyed, the Passive can no 
longer be cared for. When a society is based on the needs of the 
Active Man, he carries the Passive ones along on his energy and 
raises them as he rises, as the whole society rises. This has been 
the pattern of all human progress. 

Some humanitarians demand a collective state because of their pity 
for the incompetent or Passive Man. For his sake they wish to harness 
the Active. But the Active Man cannot function in harness. And once 
he is destroyed, the destruction of the Passive Man follows 
automatically. So if pity is the humanitarians' first consideration, 
then in the name of pity, if nothing else, they should leave the 
Active Man free to function, in order to help the Passive. There is 
no other way to help him in the long run. 

The history of mankind is the history of the struggle between the 
Active Man and the Passive, between the individual and the 
collective. The countries which have produced the happiest men, the 
highest standards of living and the greatest cultural advances have 
been the countries where the power of the collective — of the 
government, of the state — was limited and the individual was given 
freedom of independent action. As examples: The rise of Rome, with 
its conception of law based on a citizen's rights, over the 
collectivist barbarism of its time. The rise of England, with a 
system of government based on the Magna Carta, over collectivist, 
totalitarian Spain. The rise of the United States to a degree of 
achievement unequaled in history — by grace of the individual freedom 
and independence which our Constitution gave each citizen against the 
collective. 

While men are still pondering upon the causes of the rise and fall of 
civilizations, every page of history cries to us that there is but 
one source of progress: Individual Man in independent action. 
Collectivism is the ancient principle of savagery. A savage's whole 
existence is ruled by the leaders of his tribe. Civilization is the 
process of setting man free from men. 

We are now facing a choice: to go forward or to go back. 

Collectivism is not the ``New Order of Tomorrow.´´ It is the order of 
a very dark yesterday. But there is a New Order of Tomorrow. It 
belongs to Individual Man — the only creator of any tomorrows 
humanity has ever been granted. 






------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Check out the new improvements in Yahoo! Groups email.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/6pRQfA/fOaOAA/yQLSAA/KlSolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian  
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to