IMHO, it is just one more tantrum of the "Blame America First" wing of the
republican party.  The US Constitution is rather clear in the first
amendment of the rights of the press.  But if the republican party actually
believes that it is the freedom of the press that is destroying America,
then we are in real trouble.

But that has been their mantra since 9/11 gave Bush an excuse to be a war
president.

FWIW, none of what I have heard about the article (I haven't actually read
it) is even news.  Everything I heard from the TV pundits about the article
was stuff we already knew was going on ten or fifteen years ago.  All of the
financial controls (spying on US citizens) was pretty well covered by at
least the "militia" and/or "conspiracy" media back during Clinton's first
term.  The excuse back then was to track militia/drug/opposition/underground
money.  IIRC, the government agency was referred to as "FinCen".

It's hard to see how that spying could be surpassed, or forgotten.

PEACE
Steven R. Linnabary, Treasurer
Franklin County Libertarian Party
(614) 891-8841
P.O.Box#115;  Blacklick, OH  43004-0115

"When you make peaceful revolution impossible, you make violent revolution
inevitable"  John F. Kennedy


----- Original Message -----
From: "John Stroebel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, July 02, 2006 3:45 AM
Subject: [Libertarian] WHAT IS THIS BS ABOUT REPORTERS COMPROMISING NATIONAL
SECURITY?



What IS this bullshite from the little man who calls himself the
Decider? HE says that, when reporters break stories about his 'programs'
it is TREASON???? That when they bring us the news on his little plans
they are COMPROMISING NATIONAL SECURITY????

First, the Constitution covers that....

Second, does this PINHEAD even REMEMBER what he said back on Sept 24
2001??? OR is his MEMORY a that beat up because of his recent
DRUG/ALCOHOL INTAKE????

Bush originally trumpeted anti-terror plan's details


By JULIE MASON
Copyright 2006 Houston Chronicle Washington Bureau

WASHINGTON - President Bush's sustained outrage last week about
newspaper reports on a program tracking terrorists' financial records
may have seemed odd considering how urgently the administration once
publicized the program's broad concepts.

Thirteen days after Sept. 11, Bush signed an executive order expanding
the Treasury Department's authority to track the bank activities of
those with suspected ties to terrorism. The White House sent reporters a
detailed fact sheet on the new powers.

For good measure, Bush summoned the news media to the Rose Garden to
trumpet the program alongside the secretaries of state and treasury.

"We're putting banks and financial institutions around the world on
notice, we will work with their governments, ask them to freeze or block
terrorists' ability to access funds in foreign accounts," Bush said. "If
they fail to help us by sharing information or freezing accounts, the
Department of the Treasury now has the authority to freeze their bank's
assets and transactions in the United States."

The information was still on the White House Web site as of Saturday.

One of the first organizations shut down with the new powers was in
Texas. With great fanfare, the Justice Department's Terrorist Financing
Task Force busted the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development,
an organization operating from a Richardson storefront.

Last week, the New York Times and others reported some of the details of
how the Bush administration has been monitoring financial transactions
since Sept. 11.

The program uses far-reaching government subpoenas to obtain financial
records from a cooperative in Belgium called Society for Worldwide
Interbank Financial Communication, according to the articles. (The Times
story was quickly matched by the Los Angeles Times and the Wall Street
Journal).

Bush reacted swiftly, calling the reports disgraceful and a compromising
of national security. Vice President Dick Cheney followed suit.

"The New York Times has now made it more difficult for us to prevent
attacks in the future," Cheney told supporters at a fundraiser in
Nebraska.

The difference between disclosures in the Rose Garden and in the
newspaper is that the Times and others are reporting operational
details, according to the White House.

At a fundraiser in Missouri, Bush intensified his rhetoric, earning a
sustained, standing ovation when he said, "There can be no excuse for
anyone entrusted with vital intelligence to leak it and no excuse for
any newspaper to print it."

Last week the Times added an article saying that some officials thought
disclosures about the intelligence program actually could stem terrorism
financing by forcing suspects to use a more informal, less reliable way
to move bank funds.

U.S. Sen. Jim Bunning, a Kentucky Republican, accused the Times of
treason for reporting on the program, while other Republicans on Capitol
Hill called for an investigation and urged the Justice Department to
pursue charges in the matter.

The House passed a resolution Thursday supporting the financial tracking
program and condemning news organizations that report on secret
surveillance programs. The action came three months after Congress
reauthorized the Patriot Act.

Short takes.At a campaign fundraiser in St. Louis last week, a
supporter in the crowd shouted to Bush, "Four more years."
Responded the president: "No more wife."


.On Thursday, Bush turns 60. Also turning 60 this year are Donald
Trump, former President Clinton and Cher.


[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Great things are happening at Yahoo! Groups.  See the new email design.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/TISQkA/hOaOAA/yQLSAA/KlSolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian  
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to