The common law standard where there is no victim there is no crime or tort and it may be said where there is a victim there is a crime and tort. There is enough pre drug war laws on the books and common law to take care of true crimes and torts that may sometimes occur with the sale of drugs.--- In [email protected], Deus Ex Machina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > mark robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Vic, > > > > First, what you call "all or nothing', we call "consistency" and > > "reciprocal / universal application". Second, you claim to speak > > for the disagreement of others but you actually speak of your > > own. Third, since you disagree with Libertarianism's main > > principles*, why do you care about its popularity? > > (*You support seat-belt laws AND drug prohibition.) > > as a parent I do support drug decriminalisation but not legalisation. > > really the LP has to ask itself, is it there to push some idealogy > or is there to get a benefit for america? the purist claim its there to > push idealogy, I beleive it should be there to get a benefit for americans. > > Vic >
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Something is new at Yahoo! Groups. Check out the enhanced email design. http://us.click.yahoo.com/SISQkA/gOaOAA/yQLSAA/KlSolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
