Good way to put it. Also the LP is far from the only libertarian 
force in the US, even going by a very very very conservative estimate 
of say one fourth of 1% of the voting age population or 500,000 out 
of 200 million, LP membership is only around 10% of that Going by 
annual revenue and assets as a gauge the LP is very small in 
comparioson to the total revenue and assets of libertarian and 
libertarian like think tanks and advocacy groups, even a number of 
them individually have more revenue and assets than the LP.--- In 
[email protected], Marlon Machado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Rob,
> 
> Welcome to our little group. Here you'll find several flavors of
> libertarian thought; some more eclectic than others, some stemming 
from
> the classical European liberal tradition, some more in line with
> classical anarchism, and some more Tory than others.
> 
> There's a few subjects such as abortion that tend to surface from 
time
> to time and, when they do, it seems you're reading the same 
postings all
> over again. Sometimes the discussion delves into deep historical and
> philosophical issues and threads seem to go on forever but they
> eventually die out.
> 
> From time to time you'll find that we're visited by "racialists,"
> "progressives" (as they tend to call themselves), and right-wing
> conservatives looking for a home or a place to vent out. They tend 
to
> hang out for a few threads of discussion and then they go away
> uneventfully. Overall the discourse is civilized and it even may get
> boring at times, especially when dealing with things related to the
> LP--not because LP stuff is boring but because it's hard to relate 
when
> you're not intimate with the details.
> 
> I hope you enjoy your stay.
> 
> M
> 
> Rob wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > I thought that it would be worthwhile me identifying where I 
stand on
> > political issues first, before we start debating the nitty gritty 
of
> > political models and whats going on in politics around the world. 
> > Coming from the other side of the world, away from the major 
hotspots
> > and in a small island nation, it may seem like I am awfully keen 
to
> > get involved in issues that others would rather run from, but it
> > reflects the way I grew up and what being Kiwi is all about. So 
bear
> > with me.
> >
> > I am a moderate - I see major flaws with both the left and right,
> > across the full spectrum of issues. 
> >
> > I believe for example that CLIMATE CHANGE, as opposed to global
> > warming or cooling is occurring. I understand that this may bring 
more
> > variability in the weather and influence climactic cycles. It is a
> > issue that should not be ignored, but it is not necessarily a 
doom and
> > gloom thing leading to huge losses of flora and fauna, 
superhurricanes
> > or anything else like that. To that end I think major research 
does
> > need to be done, but that its outcomes are not necessarily geared
> > toward determining how much longer we have until fossil fuels 
should
> > be banned.
> >
> > You have to be realistic.
> >
> > I do believe that Government has a place in issues like health,
> > education and social welfare, but not to the extent that a nanny 
state
> > should exist. It is more to protect the very young, the elderly 
and
> > those incapable of fending for themselves - my view is that the 
very
> > vast majority of people will seek work if they are able to, but 
that
> > there must be a social safety net to play backstop.
> >
> > There is a place for a strong Constitutional framework in all
> > countries. At the very least, for countries that do not have a
> > Constitution as such - like my own - I think the Constitution 
should
> > define the processes for electing officials, the basic rights of 
the
> > citizens as well as the structure of the judicial, executive and
> > legislative branches. I will explain the New Zealand situation in 
a
> > separate post for those wondering why we have no Constitution as 
such.
> >
> > In terms of property rights, if a balance between property rights 
and
> > collective responsiblity to the environment and community can be
> > achieved, then I have no problem. The biggest problem is staying a
> > consistent course against "creeping change" in which earlier 
decisions
> > are eroded by constant nibbling around the edges - i.e minor
> > development gets the go-ahead in a sensitive area and then as 
soon as
> > it looks like the original development is okay, pressure for more
> > development gets piled on.
> >
> > I recognise indigenous peoples rights - notable in New Zealand 
under
> > the Treaty of Waitangi and the tribunal that has been set up to 
hear
> > and settle greivances. They are equal under the law to anyone 
else,
> > and should be afforded the same rights and responsibilities as 
anyone
> > else.
> >
> > Rob
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>






ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian  
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to