--- In [email protected], "gclark809" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "What happened to the separation of church and state?" he said. "The
> phonies and hypocrites in office talk about the sanctity of marriage
> and can't see the love in this room." [snip]
That is a good question. Why should the state define marriage? For
many people but not all people marriage is something that is
sanctioned and recognized abd defined by their church. The state
should not be involved and thus it is not something that should be
subject to a vote on whether or not the state should be empowered to
define a particular relationship between people as a state sanctioned
and recognized marriage. I would vote no and my decision would not be
based on hate, it would be based on my support of individual liberty.
The state should not define any relationship as a marriage. A yes vote
on this issue would give more power to the state.
$ Boston Tea Party member.
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
