--- In [email protected], "terry12622000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> Basically many land value single tax theorist say that all taxes on 
> labor and capital should end and replaced with a single tax on the 
> unimproved value of land. Henry George  wrote down much of the 
theory 
> in the late 19 century in his book Progress and Poverty, he 
suggested 
> collecting per year the great majority of the economics rental 
value 
> of land, he suggested the owner could keep 10% of the unimproved 
> value for managing it. Often the rental value is based on the 
average 
> interest rate times the unimproved value. Say your home is valued 
at 
> 230,000 dollars which is about the median in the US, say the 
> unimproved land value is 25% of that, then the unimproved value 
would 
> be 57,500 dollars, if the assement value for tax purposes is 90% of 
> that, then it would be 51,750 dollars, if the average interest rate 
> is 7% your single and only tax would be 3,622 dollars and 50 cents 
no matter if 
> your income was 5,000 a year or 5 million a year, no sales tax, no 
> social security tax, no income tax, no beer tax, no whisky tax, no 
> gas tax, no licence plate fees, no custom duties above inspection 
> costs at least, no cigarette tax, no tax on your home, fence, 
> swimming pool, driveway pavment, store building, equipment and 
> supplies or factory buildings, equipment or product, only a tax on 
> the value of land that the owner did not improve. Not a bad deal 
for 
> the vast majority of people and businesses. Some land tax theorist 
> suggest offering a lien to people or businesess than can not afford 
> to pay the tax, the lien could be collect upon sale or tranfered to 
> an heir upon an owners death. That would be be much better than 
what 
> most local governments offer these days, if they offer a lien at 
all 
> it appears it is usually only for seniors or 
> veterns.                            
>                                                                     
  
>     
>       Many land tax theorist base their ethical stand on Lockes 
> leaving as good and enough when taking land out of the commons. 
> Personally I agree that if someone encloses land that is being 
> commonly used he owes compensation to the other users if he did not 
> leave as good and enough but I do not think this prniciple of 
> compensation should apply to outsiders or those who had not being 
> using the land plus I think if a person finds land not used or 
> claimed and puts it to use he does not owe anyone 
> compensation.                     
>              One of the main problems of how the land value tax 
> fiqure value is not taking to account that often if not most of the 
> time most of the land value is created by labor and capital, 
natural 
> value is usually a small percentage of the value. True the owner of 
> the  apprased plot did not create this " unimproved value" but 
others 
> did. Really the land value tax theorist  usually do take into 
account 
> the improvement by others but they tend to assume it was created by 
> government or the community, yet a minority of land owners in an 
area 
> can create most of the land value in the area, possibly in some 
cases 
> only 1 landowner. For example say a  private hospital or a private 
> shopping mall builds on a small portion of the land area in a given 
> area and the land value more than doubles in the area. Was that 
value 
> mostly created by nature, by roads,  water systems, bridges etc? No 
> those things were there before. Was the value mostly created by the 
> total community or all of the land owners? No it was created by 1 
> land owner.   Does the land tax theorist think all the surrounding 
> land owners should pay rent to the hospital or shopping mall? I 
doubt 
> it, so why should a landowner pay rent to a community or the 
> government?
>






------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Something is new at Yahoo! Groups.  Check out the enhanced email design.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/SISQkA/gOaOAA/yQLSAA/KlSolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian  
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to