Based on your very transparent bias-history, let me translate
your "walked through", "graded" and "explained": you told them
how scoring more as an authoritarian was not really more
authoritarian, but more libertarian.
-Mark
************
{American jurors have complete Constitutional authority to vote
"not guilty" based on nothing more than a disagreement with the
case, no matter the evidence - despite the judge's instructions.
There is absolutely no obligation to vote "guilty" to arrive at a
unanimous verdict. Get on a jury, stand your ground, and fulfill
its other main purpose: to counteract abusive government and
unjust lawsuits.
See www.fija.org
[Please adopt this as your own signature.] }
------------------
Do you know how many Political Quizes I handed out to Lieberman
campaign workers and volunteers?
Oh, maybe 40 to 50.
With just about all of them, I walked them through the Quiz, and
explained the questions to them, and especially graded them and
explained to them the Pro-Freedom position on the issues they got
wrong.
I can assure you every one of these political activists came away
with a positive impression of libertarianism and the libertarian
movement.
But I guess, it's better if we libertarians simply play it safe.
Continue to attend our Monthly LP Supper Club meetings at Chiles
and
talk about issues amongst our Libertarian friends for hours on
end,
huh?
Best not to get our hands dirty in the business of real world
politics. Nah, let's continue to Preach to the Chior.
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
