Where someone ends up on the quiz I handed out is irrelevant because as we all know, the quiz DOES NOT determine who is or is not a libertarian. It merely shows those who MIGHT be libertarians, and who are worth approaching.
The NAP determines who is or isn't a libertarian. The quiz is just an outreach tool. Not one of the people I mentioned in my post or those you bring up repeatedly are consistent with their libertarianism. --- In [email protected], "Eric Dondero Rittberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Incredible. > > Every single one of the individuals you mention below would fall > well within the Libertarian Quadrant of the Political Quiz that you > were handing out. > > Take Jesse Ventura. Go ahead, answer the questions for him. > > I think you'll find he ends up at about 80/80. > > Tom McClintock? More like 90/100. > > How you going to explain that to those "40,000" people you handed > those cards out to? > > > --- In [email protected], "Paul" <ptireland@> wrote: > > > > Know how many Mark Selzer and I handed out at the 4-Day's of Unity > > Rave? Over 10,000. Then I set us up with an information booth > (for > > free) at an even larger rave with 45,000 people where we handed out > > close to 20,000 cards, stickers, balloons, and lollypops. At this > one > > event we registered more than 500 people to be libertarians and > got 20 > > or so to join the party. > > > > Your so-called activist resume will never compare, especially when > you > > include the anti-libertarian things you've done like setup a > webpage > > encouraging people to vote for the single least libertarian > president > > in American history, claiming incredibly non-libertarian people > like > > Joe Lieberman, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Dennis Miller, Tom > McClintock, > > Jesse Ventura, etc. were libertarians and thus proving your don't > > comprehend the meaning of the word "libertarian", let alone work > > toward libertarianism. > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Eric Dondero Rittberg" > > <ericdondero@> wrote: > > > > > > Do you know how many Political Quizes I handed out to Lieberman > > > campaign workers and volunteers? > > > > > > Oh, maybe 40 to 50. > > > > > > With just about all of them, I walked them through the Quiz, and > > > explained the questions to them, and especially graded them and > > > explained to them the Pro-Freedom position on the issues they > got > > > wrong. > > > > > > I can assure you every one of these political activists came > away > > > with a positive impression of libertarianism and the libertarian > > > movement. > > > > > > But I guess, it's better if we libertarians simply play it > safe. > > > Continue to attend our Monthly LP Supper Club meetings at Chiles > and > > > talk about issues amongst our Libertarian friends for hours on > end, > > > huh? > > > > > > Best not to get our hands dirty in the business of real world > > > politics. Nah, let's continue to Preach to the Chior. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Andr� Kenji de Kenji de" > > > <andrekenjilistas2@> wrote: > > > > > > > > http://hammeroftruth.com/2006/08/08/libertarians-urged-to- > board- > > > joementum-train-wreck/ > > > > RLC Founder Urges Libertarians to Board "Joementum" Train Wreck > > > > > > > > [image: Lieberman - libertarian rumors]According to the latest > > > polls, > > > > Joe "Kissy > > > > Face<http://www.wonkette.com/politics/funny-pictures/bush- > kissing- > > > lieberman-video-032091.php>" > > > > Lieberman is running over 10 points behind Ned > > > > "Kos- > > > > Approved<http://www.newhavenindependent.org/archives/2006/05/nedheads > > > _pay_ho.html>" > > > > Lamont in the Connecticut Democratic primary race for Senate. > > > Barring a > > > > miracle, Joe Lieberman will *not* be the Democratic nominee. > > > However, the > > > > taller half of "Sore/Loserman > > > > > > > > 2000<http://archives.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/12/04/stickers. > > > election/>" > > > > has indicated that he will run as an independent for the seat > > > after a > > > > trouncing by his own party. > > > > > > > > Now, why should Lieberman's sour grapes independent run, which > may > > > have cost > > > > him the primary in the first > > > > > > > > place<http://politicalwire.com/archives/2006/08/08/thoughts_on_connec > > > ticut.html>, > > > > matter to libertarians? According to Eric "Master > > > > Shake<http://www.ncc-1776.org/tle2004/tle275-20040613-04.html>" > > > > Dondero Rittberg, > > > > > > > > liberventionist<http://www.antiwar.com/stromberg/s041302.html>gadfly > > > > and founder of the Republican > > > > Liberty Caucus <http://www.rlc.org/> (their motto: "he > promised to > > > stop > > > > beating us if we stay and work it out"), Lieberman is "one of > the > > > ONLY > > > > decent Democrats in the Nation" and deserves libertarian > support. > > > Not only > > > > that, he's pimping Libertarians for Lieberman on various email > > > > > lists<http://www.libertarianpeacenik.com/articles/lieberman.htm>and > > > > encouraging people to call him on his cell phone to help. > > > > > > > > Leaving aside for a second that Lieberman is > > > > pro- > > > > war<http://www.nypost.com/news/regionalnews/pro_war_lieberman_bombing > > > > _with_dems_regionalnews_maggie_haberman__in_west_hartford__conn___and > > > _tom_topousis__in_new_york.htm>, > > > > pro- > > > > censorship<http://stupidevilbastard.com/index/seb/comments/sen_joseph > > > _lieberman_gets_worked_up_over_video_games_again/>, > > > > and pro-government > > > > > > > > intervention<http://www.boston.com/news/local/connecticut/articles/20 > > > 06/07/28/michael_schiavo_campaigns_against_lieberman/>(especially > > > > since the > > > > last Presidential candidate Rittberg > > > > > > > > endorsed<http://web.archive.org/web/20040925062425/http://www.liberta > > > riansforbush.com/>was > > > > all of those things), haven't we libertarians learned a painful > > > > lesson about endorsing defectors from the major > > > > parties<http://hammeroftruth.com/2006/06/06/an-inconvenient- > > > libertarian-video-clip-william-weld-doesnt-want-you-to-watch/>? > > > > Not only is Lieberman not a libertarian, I'm predicting that > after > > > the polls > > > > close in Connecticut tonight, he's also going to be a loser. > > > > > > > > While some rightly criticize our willingness to lose while > > > clinging to our > > > > principles <http://www.freeliberal.com/archives/000450.html>, > > > Rittberg would > > > > have us abandon our principles to lose with a loser who's > > > abandoned his. > > > > > > > > Update by Stephen VanDyke: RLC Secretary Thomas Sewell > commented: > > > > > > > > I can tell you categorically that Rittberg is not an officer, > > > spokesman or > > > > otherwise entitled to speak on behalf of the RLC. Please > attribute > > > his views > > > > solely to him, not to the RLC. > > > > > > > > Ouch > > > > > > > > Update by Nicholas Sarwark: As predicted, Lieberman > > > > > > > > lost<http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2006/08/lieberman_concedes > > > _connecticut.html>and > > > > he's gonna pick up his sour grapes and try to run as an > > > Independent. > > > > It's a gutsy move, but all of the bigtime Dems he got to stump > for > > > him in > > > > the primary are very unlikely to support him now that Ned > Lamont > > > has been > > > > selected as the Democratic nominee. > > > > > > > > Update by Nicholas Sarwark: Looks like Rittberg is in good > > > > > > > > company<http://politicalwire.com/archives/2006/08/09/rove_offers_help > > > _to_lieberman.html>in > > > > backing Lieberman's bid. > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
