The 600 are all libertarians who ran as libertarians under the LP
banner.  

The RLC has never gotten anyone elected to any position.  Not even dog
catcher.


--- In [email protected], "Eric Dondero Rittberg"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hey, does that "600" List include Don Gorman up in New Hampshire who 
> was elected on both the Libertarian and Republican lines?  
> 
> 
> --- In [email protected], "Paul" <ptireland@> wrote:
> >
> > The RLC hs never gotten a single person elected to office, 
> libertarian
> > or otherwise; not one.  Also, the Republican party has no 
> libertarians
> > in it and that includes Ron Paul.
> > 
> > The Libertarian Party on the other hand has gotten over 600
> > libertarians elected.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --- In [email protected], "Eric Dondero Rittberg"
> > <ericdondero@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Outstanding question Matt.  And welcome to our Forum.  
> > > 
> > > Here's my thoughts on the matter.
> > > 
> > > I think there was a groundswell of support for libertarian 
> ideals in 
> > > the late 1970s and early 1980s.  This all culminated in the 
> highly 
> > > successful Ed Clark, Libertarian for President Campaign in 1980 
> (and 
> > > to a lesser extent Ron Paul's LP Presidential Campaign in 
> 1988).  It 
> > > also resulted in 3 Libertarians being elected to the Alaska 
> > > Legislature, and scores of Libertarians winning nationwide for 
> local 
> > > offices.
> > > 
> > > Since then. the Libertarian Party has experienced a serious 
> decline 
> > > in electoral victories and Presidential vote totals.  
> > > 
> > > In 1990, Libertarian Party members started joining the GOP, and 
> > > formed the Republican Liberty Caucus.
> > > 
> > > Since then, virtually all of the major libertarian electoral 
> > > victories have been a result of the RLC, not the LP.
> > > 
> > > The LP's decline has seriously hurt the Liberty Movement.  I 
> don't 
> > > see a "libertarian groundswell" out there any more like there 
> was in 
> > > the '80s.
> > > 
> > > The RLC has been only partially successful.  It has succeeded in 
> > > getting libertarians elected to office in a spotty fashion; 1 
> guy in 
> > > Maine, another guy in Alaska, 2 guys down in Texas, 2 guys in 
> > > Colorado, and so on.
> > > 
> > > The RLC has not succeeded in electing enough libertarians to 
> make a 
> > > difference.  It's more like "Oh ya, that odd libertarian guy we 
> have 
> > > in our GOP Caucus here in the 'Pick-your-State' Legislature..."
> > > 
> > > Unless libertarians of all stripes get super-serious about 
> politics 
> > > and trade in the on-line blogging and LP supper club monthly 
> > > meetings for precinct walking, sign waving, phone banks, and 
> > > fundraising for RLC-backed candidates, we are never going to 
> succeed.
> > > 
> > > The entire libertarian movement, both LP and RLC, needs to 
> transform 
> > > itself into a libertarian version of the Club for Growth.  
> > > 
> > > I invite you to check out my web site which advocates this 
> approach:
> > > 
> > > www.mainstreamlibertarian.com
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- In [email protected], "matthew_reider" 
> > > <matthew_reider@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Full disclosure: I am neither a libertarian nor a fan of 
> > > unregulated
> > > > capitalism.  But I am earnest in trying to figure out where
> > > > Libertarians stand - and I am not here to pick a fight.
> > > > 
> > > > It seems like the Libertarian argument has gained some 
> strength in 
> > > the
> > > > last decade or more.  This correlates to the strength of the 
> fiscal
> > > > conservative viewpoint and republican success over Democrats in
> > > > representative government.
> > > > 
> > > > It is my belief that these trends have much to do with one 
> another 
> > > and
> > > > that Republicans have done a good job of co-opting the 
> Libertarian
> > > > agenda while not following that agenda whatsoever.  Reagan was 
> the
> > > > first in a line of contemporary republicans who appealed to the
> > > > public's sense  of paranoia about "big government" and started 
> what
> > > > became a twenty-five year republican mission to dismantle many 
> of 
> > > the
> > > > federally funded social programs established by Reagan's 
> > > predecessors.
> > > > 
> > > > My question to the group looks something like this:  Do you 
> > > generally
> > > > agree that Libertarian ideology has helped to elect people 
> like 
> > > George
> > > > W. Bush to the white house and, if so, do you find this 
> troubling?
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks for considering my question!
> > > > 
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > 
> > > > Matt
> > > >
> > >
> >
>








ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian  
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to