And I just learned that the Libertarian Party has an excellent shot of electing a State Legislator in Vermont. Some guy who has managed to get his name listed on both the Libertarian and Republican lines, and as a result he's extremely confident of victory in November.
Finally! After some 15 years, the LP may have a State Legislator again. --- In [email protected], "steven linnabary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Fusion voting is stupid. Why not join the Democratic Party too? > After all you're just as much a Democrat as you are a Republican. > > ***** > > And what is wrong with seeking and accepting endorsements in order to win? > As Eric often says, politics is about winning. He is right about that. And > serious candidates do seek endorsements. > > How is it any different than seeking and accepting the endorsement of a > newspaper? Or from NORML or the ACLU or some gun club? > > As long as a Libertarian candidate hasn't given up principle for an > endorsement, what can it hurt? Indeed, most of the New Hampshire state > representatives were elected with republican and/or democrat fusion or cross > endorsements. But they were all known as Libertarians first, and didn't > sell out principle. > > PEACE > Steven R. Linnabary, Treasurer > Franklin County Libertarian Party > (614) 891-8841 > P.O.Box#115; Blacklick, OH 43004-0115 > > "When you make peaceful revolution impossible, you make violent revolution > inevitable" John F. Kennedy > ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
