UNENGAGED WOMEN OVER 18?!? What if they are engaged? What if they are married? Do you support laws against these acts? If so, why?
Do you believe government is here to prevent "sin"? --- In [email protected], "David Macko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > As stated previously, I oppose all laws to prevent interracial marriage, pornography, > prostitution by any unmarried, unengaged woman over 18 or any homosexual behavior > by voluntarily acting adults. I do not believe that any CofCC members, at least those > whom I met at the recent conventions, have any intent to promote such laws. > > For life, liberty, justice and peace, > David Macko > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [email protected] > Sent: Friday, September 15, 2006 1:03 AM > Subject: Re: [Libertarian] The Fallacy of Open Immigration by Stephen Cox > > > Umm, yeah #6 does. Re-read it. They very clearly state that they oppose > the state tolerating interracial marriage, pornography and homosexuality. > Sounds like a clear call for prohibition to me. No one is putting words > in anyone's mouth and you know it. Quit making excuses for this group. > > They are not libertarians, no matter how libertarian leaning a few of > their beliefs may seem to those looking for a straw to grasp. They lean > more toward the Constitution Party types (especially with their promotion > of Christian Nationalism). > > Admit it. I pegged you and your defense of the non-libertarian CofCC is > not helping. > > __________________________________________________________ > James Landrith > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > cell: 703-593-2065 * fax: 760-875-8547 > AIM: jlnales * ICQ: 148600159 > MSN and Yahoo! Messenger: jlandrith > Taking the Gloves Off - http://www.jameslandrith.com > The Multiracial Activist - http://www.multiracial.com > The Abolitionist Examiner - http://www.multiracial.com/abolitionist/ > __________________________________________________________ > > > #6 does not advocate outlawing of interracial marriages and homosexuality. > > Until they do advocate such foolish, antilibertarian positions, quit > > putting words > > into their mouths. > > 3,4,5,7, 9, 10 and 13 and 12 to some extent are explicitly libertarian. 11 > > and 14 are > > contrary to libertarian principles. The other planks are neither pro- nor > > anti-libertarian > > since they do not advocate the initiation of force to achieve their ends. > > 8 out of 14 is pretty good, compared to most organizations. 2 out of 14 is > > not nearly > > as bad as many other organizations. > > For the record I disagree with Plank 1. No nation which would allow the > > murder > > of forty million of its unborn children and twice elect William Jefferson > > Blythe Clinton IV > > and George Walker Bush as president can honestly be termed a Christian > > nation. > > > > For life, liberty, justice and peace, > > David Macko > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
