Ok, I reviewed this guys stand on the issue, no way is Zeese libertarian. These guys of the Reform the LP make me sick and so far it appears it is mostly guys. One of the worst ones is this Hammer of Truth guy who would not know common sense truth if it bite him on the ass. Am I trying to goad these people into a debate right here on this board. You damn right I am and they don't have the smarts are guts to come here and do it.--- In [email protected], "mdcrabcakes1111" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Here in Maryland, the Libertain Party thinks you can be a > Libertarian and a Green at the same time! www.kevinzeese.com > What the hell is this party doing tossing its principles out the > window??!!!???!!! > > Connie > > > > --- In [email protected], "Paul" <ptireland@> wrote: > > > > There is no "limited libertarianism" or "partial libertarianism" or > > "mostly libertarian", etc. > > > > You're a libertarian or you're not. You believe in or support the > > NAP, or you don't. > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Terry L Parker" <txliberty@> > > wrote: > > > > > > A strict reading of Merriam-Webster's definition of the > uncapitalized > > > word libertarian, could describe a possible socio-path! > > > > > > > > > > > > FROM: Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary > > > > > > > > > Main Entry: lib�er�tar�i�an > > > Pronunciation: "li-b&r-'ter-E-&n > > > Function: noun > > > > > > > > > 1 : an advocate of the doctrine of free will > > > > > > 2 a : a person who upholds the principles of absolute and > > > unrestricted liberty especially of thought and action > > > > > > b capitalized : a member of a political party advocating > libertarian > > > principles > > > > > > - libertarian adjective > > > - lib�er�tar�i�an�ism /-E-&-"ni-z&m/ noun > > > > > > at http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/libertarian > > > > > > > > > SeeAlso: Liberty > > > at http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/liberty > > > > > > MoreAt http://www.onelook.com/ > > > AndAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian > > > > > > > > > If such a 'free spirit' also commands enough material agency > (aka: > > > brute physical force power) they can become a dictator over > others > > > that don't have enough power to prevail in resisting. > > > > > > But, there may also be others in this arena with enough > countervailing > > > power to remain uncounquered. If, instead of competing for > kingship > > > (playing 'king of the mountain') they enter into a 'truce' over > such > > > physical aggression they can become an 'oligarchy' (dictatorship > by a > > > ruling elite) This reciprocity would be of course LIMITED to a > > > relative few; some Liberty & Justice for SOME > > > > > > The ancient Roman Republic was such an oligarchy; in which most > > > people were either slaves (aka: property) or otherwise NOT part > of > > > the ruling elite. Since some people and actions were EXCEPTED > from > > > the elite's reciprocity of a physical aggression truce that > otherwise > > > enabled mutually beneficial human interaction, this scenario can > be > > > considered to be an example of 'LIMITED libertarianism' > > > > > > > > > 'UNIVERSAL libertarianism' is what humanity has conceptualized > and > > > been progressing towards during the last several hundred years. > > > > > > Actually, there have been multiple arenas of 'physical aggression > > > truces' since BEFORE humanity. In any grouping of social > critters, > > > a 'truce' on physical aggression is present to the degree that > there > > > is mutual beneficial interaction within that group. For > example, in > > > the ancient Roman Republic, there was a physical aggression truce > > > among the ruling elite, others among slaves and so on. None of > this > > > is to say that these various truces were adhered to perfectly of > > > course. > > > > > > But, humanity is 'growing up' > > > > > > Libertarianism of the UNIVERSAL kind, in today's 'shrinking > world' > > > political arena is humanity's last best hope.... > > > > > > reciprocal comprehensive physical autonomy for ALL persons > > > > > > aka: Liberty & Justice for ALL > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Terry L Parker" <txliberty@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Can you just see it.... > > > > > > > > The ideal civilizing principle > > > > that can be held in common > > > > by virtually ALL persons... > > > > > > > > It is a truce! > > > > > > > > But, it requires that to it, ALL are consistent! > > > > > > > > To the extent that there is a 'truce' on any person > > > > INITIATING, or CREDIBLY threatening to initiate, > > > > physical aggression against an innocent person > > > > or their justly held possessions.... > > > > there is 'Liberty & Justice for ALL' > > > > aka UNIVERSAL Libertarianism > > > > > > > > > > > > AlsoSee- Aggressors Promote LIMITED 'Libertarianism' > > > > at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/message/38717 > > > > > > > > > > > > -Terry Liberty Parker > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian > > > > VoiceCall 1.512.462.1776 > > > > > > > > every Sunday 6:30pm (central) to ? > > > > I host informal disscussion > > > > to which all are welcome > > > > who want to consider ideas & issues > > > > of Liberty & Justice for ALL > > > > (aka libertarianism) > > > > > > > > in Hickory St Grill at 8th & Congress, Austin TX > > > > Look for me, MyPicAt http://profiles.yahoo.com/txliberty > > > > > > > > > >
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
