ABC 20/20 2006.09.29 
Differences between male and female brains are explored. 
http://txliberty.dyndns.org/inetpub/wwwroot/webfiles/ABC2020060929.wmv
 

FROM: AustinLibertyInterNet Radio/TV 
at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LibertyProspects/links   

 
(Due to popular demand, the system is often too busy to respond; so 
try back often.  Right click playbacks to 'save target as...' to 
download selections to your computer for replay later at your 
convenience and as often as you want)



--- In [email protected], "Terry L Parker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> To become PERSONS (entities with rights & obligations) whose 
> 'free moral agency' is CONSISTENT with universal libertarianism 
> most humans must, to some extent, transcend part of their 
> biological heritage:  
> 
> Female humans in general are BIOLOGICALLY 'optimized' for breeding,
> nurturing vulnerable babies & children thru a lengthy (relative)
> development into early adulthood, attracting and 'securing'
> maintenance and support for her brood; USUALLY by a male who is
> powerful enough to be a good 'provider' This is why 'power' is
> GENERALLY such an 'aphrodisiac' to breeding age females.  
> The 'optimal' range of attention is the 'nest' with its 'clients' 
> to which they are giving 'care' and keeping the provider 'involved'
> (committed?)
> 
> Male humans who are not sufficiently 'susceptible' to the 'charms'
> of 'involvement' in this scenario so that they will risk life 
> and limb (if need be) in SUCCESSFUL quests for 'provisions' 
> are less likely to have their genetic dispositions 'promoted' :)
> 
> Child humans are already 'natural libertarians' though not yet 
> mature enough to CONSISTENTLY 'get it right'
> 
> If two tykes are fighting in a sandbox, what is the most 
> probable defense that will be given to the intervening 'care 
> giver' to 'justify' this physical assault of a 'peer' It will 
> be something like he/she 'started it' There may be gross 
> misunderstanding of the situation which thus resulted in a 
> 'self-defense' response. BUT, without having read an entire 
> library on philosophy, if the tyke can talk, the tyke at least 
> gets the libertarian 'self-defense' paradigm right.  
> 
> Now comes one of the most destructive acts to human liberty; 
> and it is administered by a usually loving caregiver. What is 
> the most likely utterance by the caregiver who intervenes? 
> 
> 'I don't care who started it, *I'm* telling you to stop' 
> 
> That 'abstracts' to something like 'your impotent developing 
> notions of PERSONHOOD (entity with rights & obligations) and 
> FREE MORAL AGENCY (self actualizing arbiter of right/wrong 
> behavior by one's self) are null and void. If you want to 
> prosper (know what's good for you) apply yourself to complying 
> with AUTHORITY and keeping its favor'  
> 
> So, now this immature human copes with an internal conflict 
> between an inherent libertarian nature and an imposed authoritarian 
> veneer. There is a 'bell curve' distribution in the population 
> of how it's resolved. 
> 
> Most will go thru life with partial resolution; thus live in 
> the central bulk of the 'bell'  
> 
> Some will shake off the 'conditioning' and live at the libertarian 
> toe of the bell curve.  
> 
> Tragically, others will stay retarded and live at the authoritarian 
> toe of the bell curve.  
> 
> Of course, a certain amount of compliance to COMPETENT caring
> authority is an enhancement to well being for the very young. 
> If they are lucky, they won't be regarded as 'property' but will 
> have parents who regard this as 'stewardship' of a developing 
> human being who is to become a 'free moral agent' and 'person' 
> in their own right.  
> 
> Those who are actually CONSISTENT in their practice of universal 
> libertarianism may be the transcending leading edge of a developing 
> new life-form (homo-liberates?)
> 
> 
> With good humor to all,
> -Terry Liberty Parker  
> ALSO: Please see what I wrote in 
> 'PERSONHOOD: Abortion & beyond'  
> at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/message/48172
>







ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian  
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to