_http://www.theobjectivestandard.com/issues/2006-fall/decline-fall-american-co
nservatism.asp_ 
(http://www.theobjectivestandard.com/issues/2006-fall/decline-fall-american-conservatism.asp)
  
The Decline and Fall of American  Conservatism 
C. Bradley Thompson, The Objective Standard, Fall  2006 
In 1994, American voters elected Republican  majorities in both the House of 
Representatives and the Senate for the first  time in 40 years. This ascent to 
power gave Newt Gingrich and his colleagues the  opportunity to launch their “
Republican  Revolution” with its signature “Contract with America” platform. 
The election was  said to mark the end of an era — the era of big government 
liberalism that had  dominated American political life since the New Deal [in 
the 1930s]. After  struggling for almost half a century to gain political 
power, the conservative  movement finally seemed to have reached the political 
promised  land. 
In theory, the “Republican Revolution” proposed to “re-limit”  the powers 
of the federal government and to restore some of the basic principles  and 
institutions of free-market economy. The preamble to the “Contract with 
America”  
pledged to the American people that the GOP would put an end to “government  
that is too big, too intrusive, and too easy with the public’s  money.” _1_ 
(http://www.theobjectivestandard.com/issues/2006-fall/decline-fall-american-cons
ervatism.asp#_edn1#_edn1)  The political goals of the Gingrich  “
revolutionaries” … did promise to begin some necessary reforms. As a rule, the  
Gingrich 
Congress preferred less to more government  controls. 
In practice, the Republicans began to whittle away at the  welfare state. 
Their first post-election budget proposed to eliminate three  cabinet agencies 
(the Departments of Commerce, Education, and  Energy) and more than 200 federal 
programs. Within a year, the  Republican-controlled House of Representatives 
had reduced federal spending  by almost $14 billion. _2_ 
(http://www.theobjectivestandard.com/issues/2006-fall/decline-fall-american-conservatism.asp#_edn2#_e
dn2)   Such early successes led even Bill  Clinton to declare in his 1996 
State of the Union address that the “era of big government is  over.” _3_ 
(http://www.theobjectivestandard.com/issues/2006-fall/decline-fall-american-conservat
ism.asp#_edn3#_edn3)   A Republican Congress passed and  Clinton signed  
far-reaching welfare reform legislation that promised to end “welfare as we 
know  
it.”  _4_ 
(http://www.theobjectivestandard.com/issues/2006-fall/decline-fall-american-conservatism.asp#_edn4#_edn4)
  
By the end of the 1990s, … advocates of limited  government faced an historic 
opportunity to begin the process of dismantling the  welfare state and 
deregulating the economy. 
So how goes the Republican Revolution twelve years  later? What is the state 
of the  American political Right in 2006? 
… For the first time since before the New Deal, the  Republican Party 
controls all three branches of the federal government. There is  a Republican 
in the 
White House surrounded by conservatives; Republicans control  the House of 
Representatives and the Senate; and seven out of nine justices  on the Supreme 
Court are appointees of Republican presidents. Republican  grand strategist 
Karl 
Rove and several conservative pundits say that prospects  look good for the 
GOP to become America’s “permanent  majority.” 
It is not just Republicans but conservative Republicans who are driving  this 
train. As William Rusher, co-founder of the modern conservative movement,  
reports, the “conservative movement has come to dominate the Republican Party  
totally.” _5_ 
(http://www.theobjectivestandard.com/issues/2006-fall/decline-fall-american-conservatism.asp#_edn5#_edn5)
   In other words, the Republican 
Party has  finally purged itself of the moderate, non-ideological, 
country-club,  
Rockefeller Republicans that once dominated the party in the 1950s and ’60s. 
The  conservative moment — the moment when conservative Republicans become  
America’s ruling class  —  has arrived. 
For over 40 years, ever since the Goldwater election  debacle in 1964, 
conservatives have methodically pursued ideological control  over the GOP. Now 
that 
they do control the Republican Party and all three  branches of the federal 
government, what exactly have conservatives  bequeathed to America? 
Here are some hard facts. Government spending has  increased faster under 
George Bush and his Republican Congress than it did under  Bill Clinton, and 
more 
people work for the federal government today than at  any time since the end 
of the Cold War.  
During Bush’s first term, total government spending  skyrocketed from $1.86 
trillion to $2.48 trillion, an increase of 33  percent (almost $23,000 per 
household, the highest level since World War  II). The federal budget grew by 
$616.4 billion during Bush’s first term in  office.  If post 9/11 defense  
spending is taken off the table, domestic spending has ballooned by 23  percent 
since 
Bush took office.  
When Bill Clinton left office in 2000, federal  spending equaled 18.5 percent 
of the gross domestic product, but by the end of  the first Bush 
administration, government outlays had increased to 20.3 percent  of the GDP. 
The 
annualized growth rate of non-defense and  non-homeland-security outlays has 
more than 
doubled from 2.1 percent under  Clinton to 4.8  percent under Bush. _6_ 
(http://www.theobjectivestandard.com/issues/2006-fall/decline-fall-american-conserva
tism.asp#_edn6#_edn6)  
Increased spending inevitably means increased  taxes. … Americans actually 
pay  more in taxes today than they did during Bill Clinton’s last year in 
office.  The 2006 annual report from Americans for Tax Reform, titled “Cost of 
Government Day,” sums up rather  nicely the intrusive role played by Republican 
government in the lives of  ordinary Americans. The report says that Americans 
had to work 86.5 days just to  pay their federal taxes, as compared to 78.5 
days 
in 2000 under Bill Clinton.  In other words, the average American has worked 
10.2 percent more for  the federal government under George Bush than under 
Bill Clinton.   
When state and local taxes (controlled in the  majority of places by 
Republicans) are added to federal taxes, Americans  worked for the government 
eight 
hours a day, five days a week, from  January 1 until July 12, meaning they 
worked full-time for the government  for more than half the year. As Tom 
Feeney, a 
congressional Republican put  it: “I remember growing up and reading in some 
school textbooks that if more  than half your paycheck went to the government, 
then you were  living in a socialist society.”  _7_ 
(http://www.theobjectivestandard.com/issues/2006-fall/decline-fall-american-conservatism.asp#_edn7#_edn7)
   ... 
Two generations ago, conservatives denounced the  growth of government and 
called for a revolution to roll back the Leviathan State created by Franklin 
Delano  Roosevelt’s New Deal. In 1994, conservatives, with their Republican 
Revolution,  rode into power on … a platform of limited government. Yet today, 
the  
conservative intellectual movement and the Bush administration are engaged in 
 ...a revolution for big-government conservatism. 
What  happened to the idea of limited-government conservatism?   Have the 
conservatives been  corrupted by power, or is there something in their basic 
philosophy that has led  them to embrace big government?  
To answer these questions … we must examine the  various ideologies that now 
dominate it. To set some context, however, let us  first recall the basic 
ideals … associated with Barry Goldwater’s 1964  presidential campaign, which, 
in 
turn, point to the principles of  America’s Founding  Fathers. 
In The Conscience of a Conservative,  regarded by many as the political 
Talmud of conservatism, Goldwater explicated  the principles of conservative 
government. He wrote that the “ancient and tested  truths that guided our 
Republic 
through its early days will do equally well for  us.” … He defined the Founders
’ “proven philosophy” …: “The legitimate  functions of government are 
actually conducive to freedom. Maintaining  internal order, keeping foreign 
foes at 
bay, administering  justice, removing obstacles to the free interchange of 
goods —the  exercise of these powers makes it possible for men to follow their 
chosen  pursuits with maximum freedom.”  _8_ 
(http://www.theobjectivestandard.com/issues/2006-fall/decline-fall-american-conservatism.asp#_edn8#_edn8)
   
… the ideal that animated the American Founding. As  Thomas Jefferson 
eloquently summarized in his First Inaugural address: “A  wise and frugal 
government, 
which shall restrain men from injuring one  another, which shall leave them 
otherwise free to regulate their own  pursuits of industry and improvement, and 
shall not take from the mouth  of labor the bread it has earned. This is the 
sum of good  government.” 
[See URL, leads to “capitalism is the only social  system that recognizes 
each  individual...”]



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian  
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to