Vic, If you are talking about verbal / speech / talking, you are essentially correct; except if it involves things like threats of violence and fraud and yelling "fire" in a theatre etc. Speech is not inherently violent, so it doesn't qualify as physical aggression. If it did, you would be in trouble for verbalizing your advocacy of worldwide warfare.
-Mark +++++++++++++ Terry L Parker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > That does not necessarily describe an atomistic society with no > interactions between these 'sovereign domains' It just means that > any physical interaction must be CONSENSUAL rather than the only > alternative option, COERCIVE. Libertarians advocate a 'consensual > society' over the 'coercive society' of authoritarians. > > Libertarianism's 'physical aggression truce' premise (aka > NAP 'non-aggression principle' & ZAP 'zero aggression principle') > thus accommodates a just and broad array of choices by > free moral agents EXCEPT for the INITIATION, or credible threat > of initiation, of physical force against the person > or justly acquired possessions of another. no one answered the question, so I am going to repeat it. according to this, libertarians are allowed to browbeat and bully anyone into doing anything so long as it doesnt involved physical force or fraud. is that correct? Vic ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
