Who Needs Government? 
     
     
     
      By Marian Tupy : 25 Oct 2006  
     
     
      
            The Czech Republic, which held general elections in June, still has 
no government. Judging by the atmosphere of mistrust between the main political 
parties, it is unlikely that the Czechs will have a government anytime soon. 
Five months later, the only certainty is that political stalemate is likely to 
continue until an early election can be agreed. Notably, the sky has not 
fallen. The country's institutional framework remains sturdy, the economy 
continues to grow apace, and some Czechs wonder if they even need government at 
all.


            The stalemate resulted from a mathematically unlikely but 
politically possible scenario in which no coalition can win a majority in 
Parliament. In December 1992, the Czechoslovak federation had only a few days 
left before its two constituent parts - the Czech lands and Slovakia - would 
separate into two independent nation-states. The team around Czech Prime 
Minister Vaclav Klaus was putting final touch-ups on the Constitution, which, 
inspired by the Constitution of the United States, would ensure a balance of 
power between the two houses of Parliament and the presidency. 


            Some critics worried that the lower house of Parliament, with 200 
members, could end up splitting evenly between two hostile camps, unable to 
reach a compromise. They wanted to limit the number of MPs to 199. In the end, 
the authors of the Czech Constitution deemed such a scenario far too 
improbable. The elections to the lower house were to be conducted on a 
principle of proportionality, with all parties that won at least 5 percent of 
the vote earning a presence in the lower house. This would, the logic went, 
result in enough small parties and coalition possibilities to prevent gridlock.


            This past June, that very unlikely scenario became reality.


            The Civic Democratic Party, which Klaus established and used to 
head, defeated the Social Democrats and won 81 seats. The Social Democrats 
received 74 seats, the Communists 26 seats, the Christian Democratic Union 13 
seats and the Green Party 6 seats. The Civic Democrats, Christian Democrats and 
Greens want to govern together, but cannot, because they only have the support 
of 100 MPs. To function, a government needs the support of 101 MPs.


            The Social Democrats could govern with the Communists, but together 
they too are one MP short of a majority. A coalition of the Social Democrats, 
Christian Democrats and Greens would be short of a majority too. It would, 
therefore, need the tacit support of the Communists. Both the Christian 
Democrats and Greens ruled that out. It seems that a grand coalition of the 
Civic Democrats and Social Democrats is out of question as well, because the 
Civic Democrat leader Mirek Topolanek and the Social Democrat leader Jiri 
Paroubek detest and distrust one another. 


            According to the Czech Constitution, it is the President who 
designates the Prime Minister and tasks him with the job of finding majority 
support in the lower house. The President of the Czech Republic is none other 
than Vaclav Klaus, who was elected to the job over 3 years ago. Predictably, he 
chose Mirek Topolanek - Klaus's successor as the leader of the Civic Democrats 
and the winner of the June election. After months of trying, Topolanek failed 
to break the deadlock and resigned. He remains as a caretaker Prime Minister, 
but has no power to carry out his legislative agenda.


            The Social Democrats, now the second-most powerful party in 
Parliament, are the next logical candidates to attempt to form a government. 
Klaus, however, does not wish to give Paroubek the opportunity. Publicly, Klaus 
claims that he worries that Paroubek's government would be too unstable. In 
reality, Klaus worries that Paroubek will succeed in getting one MP from the 
Green Party or Christian Democrats to switch allegiances. The obvious solution 
for the country would be to hold an early election. But Paroubek, seeing his 
party's preferences slipping in recent weeks due to the recently unearthed 
evidence of corruption committed by the Social Democrats when they were in 
power, refuses to give early election the necessary parliamentary approval. And 
so the stalemate continues. 


            All the while, the Czech economy continues to perform nicely. 
Unemployment fell from 8.8 percent in August 2005 to 7.8 percent in August 
2006, and economic growth is projected to reach 6 percent this year. The 
continued growth of the economy suggests that the investors perceive the Czech 
Republic as a safe place for their savings. That is a vote of confidence in the 
strength of the Czech institutional framework and the progress that the country 
has made since the fall of the Berlin Wall.


            It appears that the Czechs can afford to be without government a 
little while longer. 


            Marian L. Tupy is a policy analyst at the Cato Institute's Center 
for Global Liberty and Prosperity.
           
           
     
     
     


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian  
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to