In a message dated 11/3/06 5:17:42 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


> Doug, then I think that you should check your premises. If I accepted the 
> endorsement then I would have to accept the premise that I have the right to 
> make 
> people do under the threat of a gun to do as I wish them to do. 
> If you cannot see that on the very face of it, then what are you doing in 
> the 
> position you are in. 
> 

I thought libertarians were against government force. Private communities 
could contractually agree to run themselves in any manner, so long as everyone 
voluntarily agreed.

No candidate must accept the endorsement of Stonewall Libertarians. Nor are 
we putting words in anyone's mouth. Many candidates uploaded the "Stonewall 
Libertarians Policy Statement" to their website and then simply stated they 
were 
in agreement with it. 

If they weren't in agreement with it, that is totally fine with me. 
Candidates are free to position themselves and accept whatever endorsements 
they 
choose.

No force involved. If you don't understand that basic point, I think you need 
a refresher course on libertarianism.

In Liberty,

Dr. Tom Stevens
Executive Director
Stonewall Libertarians
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Stonewall_Libertarians


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian  
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to