Oh I'm so glad ROn Paul is against this. I don't live in Texas but if 
it goes throught it will happen in the Southeast too. Check out 
Perry's response FAQ, it is so lame. Such lame answers as  yes eminet 
domain will have to be use but if we do not build it many more roads 
will have to be built and more eminet 
domain.                                    
      Sort of reminds me of the Reform the LP movement and something 
Harry BRowne once said, Harry said the government breaks your legs 
gives you a crutch and tell you to be glad just like the  REformer 
the LP wants to break our legs and be glad they did not break or 
arms  too like the Democrats and 
Republicans.                            
           How about they just take their Hammer Of Untruth and shove 
it up their ass.--- In [email protected], [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
>
> 
> The NAFTA  Superhighway
> 
> by _Ron Paul_ (http://www.house.gov/paul/mail/welcome.htm)
> by Ron  Paul
>  (http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul349.html#)
> (http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul349.html#)    
(http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul349.html#)
> (http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul349.html#)    _
> DIGG  THIS_
> (http://digg.com/submit?
phase=2&url=http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul349.html&title=The 
NAFTA Superhighway&topic=political_opinion)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> By now many Texans have  heard about the proposed ¡°NAFTA 
Superhighway,¡±
> which is also referred to as  the trans-Texas corridor. What you 
may not know is
> the extent to which plans for  such a superhighway are moving 
forward without
> congressional oversight or media  attention.
> 
> 
> This superhighway would  connect Mexico, the United States, and 
Canada,
> cutting a wide swath through the  middle of Texas and up through 
Kansas City.
> Offshoots would connect the main  artery to the west coast, 
Florida, and northeast.
> 
> 
> Proponents envision a  ten-lane colossus the width of several 
football
> fields, with freight and rail  lines, fiber-optic cable lines, and 
oil and natural
> gas pipelines running  alongside.
> 
> 
> This will require  coordinated federal and state eminent domain 
actions on an
> unprecedented scale,  as literally millions of people and 
businesses could be
> displaced. The loss of  whole communities is almost certain, as 
planners
> cannot wind the highway around  every quaint town, historic 
building, or senior
> citizen apartment for thousands  of miles.
> 
> 
> 
> Governor Perry is a  supporter of the superhighway project, and 
Congress has
> provided small amounts  of money to study the proposal. Since this 
money was
> just one item in an  enormous transportation appropriations bill, 
however, most
> members of Congress  were not aware of it.
> 
> 
> The proposed highway is  part of a broader plan advanced by a
> quasi-government organization called the  ¡°Security and 
Prosperity Partnership of North
> America,¡± or SPP.
> 
> 
> The SPP was  first launched in 2005 by the heads of state of 
Canada, Mexico,
> and the United  States at a summit in Waco.
> 
> 
> Click to  join catapultthepropaganda
> 
> _http://groups.yahoo.com/group/catapultthepropaganda/join_
> (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/catapultthepropaganda/join)
> 
> 
> 
> _
> Click to join  openmindopencodenews_
> (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/openmindopencodenews/join)
> 
> _http://groups.yahoo.com/group/openmindopencodenews/join_
> (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/openmindopencodenews/join)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> The SPP was not created  by a treaty between the nations involved, 
nor was
> Congress involved in any way.  Instead, the SPP is an unholy 
alliance of foreign
> consortiums and officials from  several governments. One principal 
player is
> a Spanish construction company,  which plans to build the highway 
and operate
> it as a toll road. But don¡¯t be  fooled: the superhighway 
proposal is not the
> result of free market demand, but  rather an extension of 
government-managed
> trade schemes like NAFTA that benefit  politically-connected 
interests.
> 
> 
> The real issue is  national sovereignty. Once again, decisions that 
affect
> millions of Americans  are not being made by those Americans 
themselves, or even
> by their elected  representatives in Congress. Instead, a handful 
of elites
> use their government  connections to bypass national legislatures 
and ignore
> our Constitution ¨C which  expressly grants Congress the sole 
authority to
> regulate international  trade.
> 
> 
> 
> The ultimate goal is not  simply a superhighway, but an integrated 
North
> American Union ¨C complete with a  currency, a cross-national 
bureaucracy, and
> virtually borderless travel within  the Union. Like the European 
Union, a North
> American Union would represent  another step toward the abolition 
of national
> sovereignty altogether.
> 
> 
> A new resolution,  introduced by Representative Virgil Goode of 
Virginia,
> expresses the sense of  Congress that the United States should not 
engage in the
> construction of a NAFTA  superhighway, or enter into any agreement 
that
> advances the concept of a North  American Union. I wholeheartedly 
support this
> legislation, and predict that the  superhighway will become a 
sleeper issue in the
> 2008 election.
> 
> 
> 
> Any movement toward a North American Union diminishes the ability 
of  average
> Americans to influence the laws under which they must live. The SPP
> agreement, including the plan for a major transnational 
superhighway through  Texas,
> is moving forward without congressional oversight ¨C
> 
>  and that is an  outrage. The administration needs a strong message 
from
> Congress that the  American people will not tolerate backroom deals 
that threaten
> our  sovereignty.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> October  31, 2006
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Dr. Ron Paul is a  Republican member of Congress from Texas.
> 
> _Ron Paul  Archives_ (http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul-
arch.html)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ____________________________________
> Low, Low, Low Rates! Check out Yahoo! Messenger's cheap _PC-to-
Phone  call
> rates._
> 
(http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/taglines/postman8/*http://us.rd.yahoo.
com/evt=39663/*http://voice.yahoo.com)
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>





ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian  
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to