Oh I'm so glad ROn Paul is against this. I don't live in Texas but if
it goes throught it will happen in the Southeast too. Check out
Perry's response FAQ, it is so lame. Such lame answers as yes eminet
domain will have to be use but if we do not build it many more roads
will have to be built and more eminet
domain.
Sort of reminds me of the Reform the LP movement and something
Harry BRowne once said, Harry said the government breaks your legs
gives you a crutch and tell you to be glad just like the REformer
the LP wants to break our legs and be glad they did not break or
arms too like the Democrats and
Republicans.
How about they just take their Hammer Of Untruth and shove
it up their ass.--- In [email protected], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
>
> The NAFTA Superhighway
>
> by _Ron Paul_ (http://www.house.gov/paul/mail/welcome.htm)
> by Ron Paul
> (http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul349.html#)
> (http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul349.html#)
(http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul349.html#)
> (http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul349.html#) _
> DIGG THIS_
> (http://digg.com/submit?
phase=2&url=http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul349.html&title=The
NAFTA Superhighway&topic=political_opinion)
>
>
>
>
> By now many Texans have heard about the proposed ¡°NAFTA
Superhighway,¡±
> which is also referred to as the trans-Texas corridor. What you
may not know is
> the extent to which plans for such a superhighway are moving
forward without
> congressional oversight or media attention.
>
>
> This superhighway would connect Mexico, the United States, and
Canada,
> cutting a wide swath through the middle of Texas and up through
Kansas City.
> Offshoots would connect the main artery to the west coast,
Florida, and northeast.
>
>
> Proponents envision a ten-lane colossus the width of several
football
> fields, with freight and rail lines, fiber-optic cable lines, and
oil and natural
> gas pipelines running alongside.
>
>
> This will require coordinated federal and state eminent domain
actions on an
> unprecedented scale, as literally millions of people and
businesses could be
> displaced. The loss of whole communities is almost certain, as
planners
> cannot wind the highway around every quaint town, historic
building, or senior
> citizen apartment for thousands of miles.
>
>
>
> Governor Perry is a supporter of the superhighway project, and
Congress has
> provided small amounts of money to study the proposal. Since this
money was
> just one item in an enormous transportation appropriations bill,
however, most
> members of Congress were not aware of it.
>
>
> The proposed highway is part of a broader plan advanced by a
> quasi-government organization called the ¡°Security and
Prosperity Partnership of North
> America,¡± or SPP.
>
>
> The SPP was first launched in 2005 by the heads of state of
Canada, Mexico,
> and the United States at a summit in Waco.
>
>
> Click to join catapultthepropaganda
>
> _http://groups.yahoo.com/group/catapultthepropaganda/join_
> (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/catapultthepropaganda/join)
>
>
>
> _
> Click to join openmindopencodenews_
> (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/openmindopencodenews/join)
>
> _http://groups.yahoo.com/group/openmindopencodenews/join_
> (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/openmindopencodenews/join)
>
>
>
>
>
> The SPP was not created by a treaty between the nations involved,
nor was
> Congress involved in any way. Instead, the SPP is an unholy
alliance of foreign
> consortiums and officials from several governments. One principal
player is
> a Spanish construction company, which plans to build the highway
and operate
> it as a toll road. But don¡¯t be fooled: the superhighway
proposal is not the
> result of free market demand, but rather an extension of
government-managed
> trade schemes like NAFTA that benefit politically-connected
interests.
>
>
> The real issue is national sovereignty. Once again, decisions that
affect
> millions of Americans are not being made by those Americans
themselves, or even
> by their elected representatives in Congress. Instead, a handful
of elites
> use their government connections to bypass national legislatures
and ignore
> our Constitution ¨C which expressly grants Congress the sole
authority to
> regulate international trade.
>
>
>
> The ultimate goal is not simply a superhighway, but an integrated
North
> American Union ¨C complete with a currency, a cross-national
bureaucracy, and
> virtually borderless travel within the Union. Like the European
Union, a North
> American Union would represent another step toward the abolition
of national
> sovereignty altogether.
>
>
> A new resolution, introduced by Representative Virgil Goode of
Virginia,
> expresses the sense of Congress that the United States should not
engage in the
> construction of a NAFTA superhighway, or enter into any agreement
that
> advances the concept of a North American Union. I wholeheartedly
support this
> legislation, and predict that the superhighway will become a
sleeper issue in the
> 2008 election.
>
>
>
> Any movement toward a North American Union diminishes the ability
of average
> Americans to influence the laws under which they must live. The SPP
> agreement, including the plan for a major transnational
superhighway through Texas,
> is moving forward without congressional oversight ¨C
>
> and that is an outrage. The administration needs a strong message
from
> Congress that the American people will not tolerate backroom deals
that threaten
> our sovereignty.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> October 31, 2006
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Dr. Ron Paul is a Republican member of Congress from Texas.
>
> _Ron Paul Archives_ (http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul-
arch.html)
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________
> Low, Low, Low Rates! Check out Yahoo! Messenger's cheap _PC-to-
Phone call
> rates._
>
(http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/taglines/postman8/*http://us.rd.yahoo.
com/evt=39663/*http://voice.yahoo.com)
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/