Oh, here we go! Libertarians can make even "juvenile gossip" boring!

--- In [email protected], "Terry L Parker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> If fraud is employed by a person to obtain MISinformed consent for 
a 
> physical interaction with another person or their justly held 
> possession, it's a violation of universal libertarianism's core 
> principle of a 'physical aggression truce' aka: NAP (non-aggression 
> principle), ZAP (zero aggression principle) and so on, since 
honestly 
> informed consent is missing from the transaction.    
> 
> PleaseSee: Your Freedom and the Rights of Others
> at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/message/22990  
> 
> 
> -Terry Liberty Parker 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian 
> 
> 
> 
> --- In [email protected], "terry12622000" <cottondrop@> 
> wrote:
> >
> > Don't equal Libertarians with Objectivist, Although Rand rejected 
> the 
> > LP and libertarians who she called right wing hippys there are 
some 
> > if not many libertarians that are Objectivist, they are welcomed 
> but 
> > they aren't a majority. I think Mr. Parker thanks the subject is 
> not 
> > important to libertarianism in general and I agree. I admire much 
> of 
> > Mrs Rands works but disagree with some of her conclusions.--- In 
> > [email protected], "jamie petroskas" <jamie.petroskas@> 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Are Libertarians afarid of discussing fraud?
> > >  Can a marriage, from the outset, be a fraud?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On 11/13/06, Terry L Parker <txliberty@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >   How on earth is this arcane gossip even relevant to the 
focus 
> > of this
> > > > forum (which is exploring the concept of libertarianism) let 
> > alone even
> > > > a 'question of the day' for all but a juvenile sense of 
> > priorities?
> > > >
> > > > -Terry Liberty Parker
> > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TerryLiberty
> > > >
> > > > --- In [email protected] <Libertarian%
> > 40yahoogroups.com>,
> > > > "jamie" <jamie.petroskas@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Question of the day.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > 
> > > >
> > > 
> > > 
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> >
>



Reply via email to