What was Loretta Webb's marriage to Doolittle Lynn? She was 13 or 14 at the time. Would you classify Loretta's husband as a pedophile? Watch the movie Coal Miner"s Daughter with your children and explain to them what is going on. Thanks!-Jamie
On 11/18/06, terry12622000 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > if the sex is conentual then its not pefophilla and non of the > sexpartners are children, if any of the sex partners is a child and > the other is an adult the adult is agressing against the child, the > jury and courts can determine if the male or female is a child or > adult, legislation on age of consent might help at the county level > in most states or even the state level in a small compact state like > New Hampshire, Vermont, Maine or Delaware but the legislation can > only be a guideline for contracts and giving law enforcement > officers and prosecutors some protection against lawsuits but > legislation should never be the last word over due process in any > matter including age of consent.--- In > [email protected]<Libertarian%40yahoogroups.com>, > > Vic Cinc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > ma ni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Vic, > > > > > > I what you are saying is you don't think libertarian philosophy > > > views pedophilia as aggression, you would be incorrect. > > > Pedophilia, being a non-consensual sex crime that has a direct > > > victim, is true initiated aggression. (Just curious: where did > > > you get the idea that is wasn't?) > > > > I think youll find that most paedophiles work on getting what they > want > > in a consensual manner. there is rarely aggression, when there is > > agression it make headlines and is not good for business. you are > > probably thinking of men in coats nabing kids into cars after > > offering them lolies. > > > > most acts are done from relatives, friends, neighbours or employs > etc winning trust of > > parents and seducing a child when the parents are not about. the > harm > > only occurs in the eyes of the parents and others. its not until the > > child sees the response in others that they consider any harm has > taken place. > > > > what you have here in the usual cases, is no real physical agression > > but a moral agression. > > > > a simple non agression pact does not cover this case, because what a > > parent wants is a moral pact, that says you dont apply your morality > > on my child. > > > > Vic > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
