Are you telling us that Bush cannot depend on one-third of the members of either
House of Congress plus one to sustain any veto of such an abomination?
Lets hope that 1/3 + 1 of the Republicans will vote to sustain. When they are
out of power, they are more likely to return to their principles.

For life and liberty,
David Macko

NOTICE: Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the National Security Agency may 
have read this email without warning, warrant, or notice. They may do this 
without any judicial or legislative oversight. You have no recourse nor 
protection save to call for the impeachment of the current President.


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Eric Dondero 
  To: General Libertarian ; Individual Sovereignty 
  Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2006 2:09 PM
  Subject: [Libertarian] Democrat Charlie Rangel says he's "serious" about a 
Military Draft


  Some libertarians said that it'd be better if the Democrats took control of 
the House and Senate. Some libertarians said that "divided government and 
checks and balances on President Bush is a good thing." Many libertarians 
before the election said, "Ah, ain't no difference between Democrats and 
Republicans..." 

  Now we learn that the Top Armed Services Democrat is pushing for a return to 
the Military Draft; perhaps the grossest violation of civil liberties 
imaginable from a libertarian perspective. 

  No doubt Republicans will fiercely oppose it, as they have done since Bush 
took over in 2001. Wonder if the libertarians who have been saying that 
Republicans are "no good on civil liberties" and Democrats are better on 
individual liberty matters will have to say now?

  Full story and link at:

  www.mainstreamlibertarian.com



  Libertarian Republicans

  Fiscally Conservative, Socially Tolerant & Pro-Defense!

  Dondero is a US Navy Veteran, former Libertarian Party National Committeeman, 
fmr. Senior Aide to US Congressman Ron Paul R-TX, and Founder of the Republican 
Liberty Caucus. www.mainstreamlibertarian.com


  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



   

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to