After Bush destroys the Middle East and other parts of the world, like the U.S.A, he will leave the mess to the Democrats in congress and the rest of us who are alive.
He really doesn't give a hoot, and never will, he is not wired that way, as he comes from his mom and dad who are just as cruel and self- centered as the rest of their friends. I wonder if there was another Hitler, but one who would "clean" the world of Bush-type people, if that would be such bad idea. Hitler believed he was doing "God's work" just like Bush, so who would be the best candidate to clean our world? The current Bush of a new Hitler-like dictator who will get rid of Bush? Well ofcourse his name wouldn't be Hitler, but you get my point....I think....lol --- In [email protected], "Mike Kenny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > i've thought conceivably bush would try to do something, either invasion or > a threat of invasion to try to destablize iran from the inside--not that i'm > an expert on foreign policy or have a very detailed understanding of any of > this. my thought is perhaps he would want to commit the US to some kind of > action that would either foment a coup inside iran while he's still in > power, or sort of put his successor in a situation where it's better to try > to continue on with a strong move to unseat the revolutionary types in iran > or deal with the aftermath the way he's tried to deal with afghanistan and > iraq ("he put troops on the ground. it's going to be worse to pull them out > than to see this to its conclusion. i guess trying to establish a democracy > is better than the alternatives at this point.") bush might do this if he > believes that his successor wouldn't deal with iran well, and that a nuclear > iran would be a danger to the US. there are obvious constraints to that > too. it might seriously hurt the republican party. it might cause him to > get impeached and perhaps there would be a popular call to pull americans > out of iraq and a strong reaction in general to the bush approach to the war > on terrorism. perhaps the reaction would lead to an almost opposite > approach to dealing with iran and terrorism in general in the future. > > all very speculative. dunno. > > mike > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Corey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Yahoo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, November 24, 2006 6:03 PM > Subject: [Libertarian] Expert: Bush can't attack Iran > > > > Expert: Bush can't attack Iran > > > > > > http://www.ynetnews.com/Ext/Comp/ArticleLayout/CdaArticlePrintPreview/ 1,2506,L-3331138,00.html > > > >
