thanks....im going to make a copy of the info for future reference..... apparently, the whole voting thing just doesn't work..
:) --- In [email protected], "rickgaber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In Libertarian message #53,399 , > > "Corey" <cpmondello@> wrote: > > > > i always thought he was appointed, maybe those sources are wrong or > > maybe it is all "word play"....either way, he did not "win" the > > position the way he should of and out current voting system stinks, > > which i think Americans may finally see. > > > > :) > > > > ps, could u provide me with links to info about what you posted, or > > email them to me...if i am going to post something, or say > > something in person, i want to make sure i cover all my bases.... > > OK, start here: http://masl.to/?D14E2574E > > If you read all the way through it, you will also see that after so > much time was wasted back and forth, the SCOTUS finally said the > recount must be stopped because of lack of time before the votes had > to be certified. This "stoppage" of the count might be considered a > de-facto "appointing" of the winner of the first counts and recounts, > which happened to be W, but that's a real stretch. Personally, I > think the order for a uniform system of counting was a good one, but > the stopping of the final recount was bad, but then again, I don't > understand all the reasons for the deadlines. >
