Business In The Beltway
The Last Tax-Free Christmas Online?
Janet Novack, 11.29.06, 6:00 AM ET

WASHINGTON, D.C. - 
There can be a guilty little pleasure in buying that $350 iPod or 
$1,200 laptop online: avoiding the sales tax you'd have to pay at a 
local store.

Technically, online purchasers owe sales tax to their home states and 
sometimes their cities or towns at combined rates averaging nearly 
7.5%. (Except if they're from Delaware, Montana, New Hampshire or 
Oregon, which don't impose sales taxes.) But the Supreme Court has 
ruled a state can't constitutionally require a merchant to collect 
the tax unless the merchant has some physical connection to that 
state--say, a warehouse or a store there.

So big national "bricks and clicks" retailers, such as Best Buy, 
Circuit City, Wal-Mart Stores and Target, collect taxes on most 
online sales. But Amazon.com only collects sales tax on shipments to 
Kansas, Kentucky, North Dakota and Washington. 

Still, as the Supreme Court itself noted, there's nothing to stop 
Congress from authorizing states to require collection by out-of-
state sellers. Nothing in the Constitution, that is. Politics are 
another matter.

Last year, Sen. Michael Enzi, R-Wyo., and Sen. Byron Dorgan, D-N.D., 
introduced similar bills that would require online and catalog 
merchants (or at least bigger ones) to collect sales taxes for any 
states that met standards set by the Streamlined Sales and Use Tax 
Agreement (SSUTA). The Enzi-Dorgan proposal stood no chance with 
taxophobic Republicans in control of the House.

Next year, with Democrats in charge? "The stars are lined up better," 
says Harley Duncan, executive director of the Federation of Tax 
Administrators, which represents state tax officials. 

It's not just the change in partisan control that has raised the 
states' hopes. They also believe they can make a stronger case for 
new collection authority now that the SSUTA, which is designed to 
harmonize and simplify sales tax laws, is finally operating. As of 
Jan. 1, 15 states will be full participants in SSUTA, meaning they've 
adopted the required changes to their own laws. State officials spent 
years haggling over such issues as whether bakery bagels should be 
considered groceries, which few states tax, or prepared food, which 
is widely taxed. (The conclusion: If a bakery provides a utensil with 
your bagel or heats it for you, it counts as prepared food.)

So far, 1,000 merchants have signed up to voluntarily collect taxes 
for the SSUTA states, Duncan reports. As an incentive, participating 
merchants who use certain sales tax processing services get their tax 
collection costs subsidized and aren't held responsible for mistakes 
those services might make.

The states aren't alone in pushing this. The E-fairness Coalition, 
representing shopping mall operators and bricks-and-mortar retailers, 
is also backing the Enzi-Dorgan legislation.

Still, you needn't rush to buy online. This is hardly a done deal. 
The 4,700-member Direct Marketing Association is fighting any new 
authority for the states, arguing the SSUTA has barely reduced the 
tax collection burden presented by 7,500 different sales 
jurisdictions. Rather than adopting a single tax rate per state, as 
the DMA demanded, the SSUTA made only "cosmetic" changes, and the 
states are "cheating" on even those, DMA tax counsel George S. 
Isaacson says. "I would hope the Democratic leadership would say, 'We 
don't want to get tagged with a bad tax bill as the introduction to 
our leadership,'" he adds.

Nor is it clear how enthusiastic some soon-to-be powerful 
congressional Democrats will be about the legislation. Neither 
California nor New York is a SSUTA member. Last month, the New York 
State Department of Taxation and Finance issued a report questioning 
whether joining is worth the hassle. Among the problems: The SSUTA 
requires a state and its cities to use the same definition of what's 
taxable and allows each local taxing jurisdiction only one sales tax 
rate. That would interfere with New York City's special local sales 
taxes on beauty salons and saunas, its special exemption for interior 
decorators, and its two special tax rates on parking--one in 
Manhattan and the other for the outer boroughs.





Reply via email to