Eric, I reject your accusation of deflection. As I said, I was only making an off-topic observation. Your post's hostility is curious in response to my rare non-hostile one; for once I was not being critical of your point. But since you insist, I shall certainly resume.
As far as your point, I have few answers. If someone does not want to defend themselves, they won't. If there's a real threat, I suppose they better hire some security. -Mark +++++++++++++ Clever attempt at a deflection. Now how about answering the serious point I made. Women on the whole are anti-gun, maybe not anti-gun ownership, but generally opposed to gun use for themselves. Now given that fact, how do you propose that females such as my wife protect themselves against crazed [and violent authoritarians regardless of being] Muslims and illegal Mexicans with criminal backgrounds from Mexico [or anywhere else] when they are in major cities like Houston? Try staying on point this time. --- In [email protected], "ma ni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Eric, > > Sorry, this might be off-topic, but I was just pondering the > prejudicial nature of your statement: "99.9% of all females hate > guns". It's a tough call. If it's true, it's not prejudicial. Or > is it? Maybe only to the .1% that don't hate them? > > -mark > > --------------- > > > Umm, yes. Cause SHE HATES GUNS!! As do most women, and don't > want > to have anything to do with them. > > They want the damned police to protect them, NOT have to rely on > carrying a gun everywhere which scares the shit out of them. > > Do you have a girlfriend Steven? If you do, I'm sure you're > aware, > that 99.9% of all females hate guns. >
