For some time before the November election especially after the
Portland Convention I have been saying that pro market people need 2
or more partities, that the LP is far from productive, that the LP is
not productive for either the purist or the libertarian lites. I
thought with at least two parties both would gain more members than
the LP has now and each would get far far more donations than the LP
gets
now.
Since the election I see the value in the REpublican Liberty
Cacus and the DEmocratic Freedom Cacus and I think both of them can
do something that I don't think the LP can do right now and probably
shouldn't even attempt now that is elect several members to the US
House of REpresentives. I think most libertarian lites would be far
more productive and happy in either the RLC or DFC than they are in
the LP. If the thoughts of helping one of the two main party is out
of the question for some even the libertarian leaning wings of the
two big boys then Maybe The Person Choice party would suit you
better, maybe the Constitutional party. or maybe the Boston Tea Party
but I think most of you would like either the RLC or
DFC.
Now as far as the LP goes I think we need to build from the grass
roots up, from the bottom/ up and we need to set our foots down
towards members that hold political office, run for political office
and hold an offical post in the
LP.
Maybe someting like the Nolan quiz as it was in 2000 should be
giving to the above and they must get
100%.
The questions droped or changed from the 2000 quiz was on taxes
and
immigration.
The tax question ask All taxes should be repealed fund the
government with user fees. Maybe a better way to put it would be
REpeal all taxes fund the government with user fees and or
donations.
Maybe the immigration question should read something like
this instead of just saying open
borders.
THe federal immigration policy is not only a failure from a
policing stand point but is a violation of individual and property
rights and is disrespectful to local situations. DO you think the
federal immigration service should be abolished?
