-- forwarded message --
 
 
Below is a statement from the Marijuana Policy Project:

"I've had  the opportunity to meet with former Congressman 
Bob Barr on two occasions  this fall. The conversations 
were quite interesting (and very civil), given  that he was 
one of the three most problematic members of Congress 
for my  organization since I co-founded MPP 12 years ago. 
While serving in Congress  from 1995 to 2003, he 

(1) prevented our 1998 medical marijuana  initiative from 
taking effect in D.C., 

(2) took the anti-medical  marijuana position while debating 
me on national TV, and 

(3) grilled  me during my testimony before a congressional
subcommittee in 2001.  

In addition, MPP orchestrated civil disobedience in his office 
on  Capitol Hill, whereby a group of activists holding various 
signs chanted  medical marijuana slogans in his office while
we laid the body of a medical  marijuana patient (with multiple 
sclerosis) in the doorway so that no one  could get in or out.

But that's in the past; he has really come around  on
drug policy issues. He acknowledges that the drug war
is a failure and  it cannot be won, he has publicly come 
out in favor of states' rights for  medical marijuana, and 
he wants to do whatever he can to shrink the size and  
reach of the federal government, which presumably 
includes the drug-war  bureaucracy (the narcocracy) -- 
DEA, ONDCP, NIDA. 

I support the  notion of Mr. Barr taking a leadership 
position with the Libertarian Party;  it's a win/win for 
him and the Party."

Rob Kampia, Executive  Director
Marijuana Policy Project



--end--
 
 
   
The below is from my friend Bonnie in New York:
 
---
 
Hi, there. Didja hear the news about Bob Barr in the debate with Nadelmann 
Thursday night? I haven't seen it on the web or in email yet, except from 
someone who was there in NYC.

Bob Barr on the Drug War, Jan 18,  2007:

"I'm willing to admit that I overlooked a lot of what was going on,  and
its gotten to the point where I'm not willing to overlook it  anymore
because the federal government has gotten just way too much power in 
a whole range of areas, not just this  one."





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to