Goldman, Merrill Almost `Junk,' Their Own Traders Say (Update2) 

      By Shannon D. Harrington

      March 2 (Bloomberg) -- Goldman Sachs Group Inc., Merrill Lynch & Co. and 
Morgan Stanley, which earned a record $24.5 billion in 2006, suddenly have 
become so speculative that their own traders are valuing the three biggest 
securities firms as barely more creditworthy than junk bonds. 

      Prices for credit-default swaps linked to the bonds of the New York 
investment banks this week traded at levels that equate to debt ratings of 
Baa2, according to Moody's Investors Service. For Goldman, Morgan Stanley and 
Merrill that's five levels below the actual Aa3 rating on their senior 
unsecured notes and two steps above non-investment grade, or junk. 

      Traders of credit derivatives are more alarmed than stock and bond 
investors that a slowdown in housing and the global equity market rout have 
hurt the firms. Merrill since 2005 has financed two mortgage lenders that 
subsequently failed and bought a third, First Franklin Financial Corp., for 
$1.3 billion. 

      ``These guys have made a lot of money securitizing mortgages over the 
years in a mortgage boom time,'' said Richard Hofmann, an analyst at bond 
research firm CreditSights Inc. in New York. ``The question now is what is the 
exposure to credit risk and what are the potential revenue headwinds if they're 
not able to keep that securitization machine humming along.'' 

      Credit-default swaps on the debt of Goldman, the world's biggest 
securities firm, have risen to $32,775 per $10 million in bonds, up from 
$21,500 at the start of the year, according to prices compiled by London-based 
CMA Datavision. The price touched $35,000 on Feb. 28, the highest since June 
2005. 

      Spokesmen and spokeswomen for Goldman, Lehman, Merrill and Morgan Stanley 
declined to comment. A spokeswoman for Bear Stearns didn't immediately return 
calls for comment. 

      Conceived to Protect 

      Morgan Stanley and Goldman were among the top five traders of 
credit-default swaps in 2005, a group that represented 86 percent of the 
market, according to a September Fitch Ratings report. Lehman, Merrill and Bear 
Stearns were among the top 12. 

      Credit-default swaps that trade at such wide gaps below actual ratings 
tend to rally, said David Munves, director of Moody's credit strategy research 
group. 

      The contracts were conceived by Wall Street to protect bondholders 
against default and pay the buyer face value in exchange for the underlying 
securities should the company fail to adhere to debt agreements. An increase in 
price indicates a decline in the perception of creditworthiness; a drop means 
the opposite. 

      Contracts tied to Morgan Stanley, Merrill, Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. 
and Bear Stearns Cos. also are at 19-month highs. 

      Rising Prices 

      Morgan Stanley credit swaps have risen $10,000 to $32,775 this year, CMA 
data show. Contracts on Merrill jumped $16,500 to $33,000. For Lehman, they are 
up $12,440 to $34,440, and the swaps on Bear Stearns have climbed $12,080 to 
$33,830. 

      By contrast, Deutsche Bank AG in Frankfurt, Germany, is trading near a 
record low at 9,800 euros, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. And, a 
Standard & Poor's index of investment bank stocks has fallen 6.29 percent this 
year. 

      The increases were larger than an index that measures credit risk for 
investment-grade companies in North America. The cost of protecting $10 million 
in debt included in the Dow Jones CDX North America Investment Grade Index has 
risen $1,250 to $34,750 this year, according to Deutsche Bank prices. 

      Lehman and Bear Stearns credit swaps traded as if their debt were rated 
four levels lower than their A1 rankings. High-yield, high-risk notes, or junk 
bonds, are rated below Baa3 at Moody's and lower than BBB- at S&P. 

      More Bearish 

      Credit-default swap investors are more bearish than bondholders, data 
from Moody's Market Implied Ratings service shows. As of Feb. 28, the bonds of 
Goldman and Morgan Stanley were trading as if the debt were rated a step below 
Moody's official rating. Goldman has $171.6 billion in bonds outstanding, 
according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Morgan Stanley has $168.5 billion. 

      Last year was the best ever for the five biggest Wall Street firms, whose 
combined profit rose 33 percent to $132.5 billion. 

      Subprime mortgages, loans taken out by homebuyers with poor or limited 
credit histories, typically charge rates at least two or three percentage 
points above safer, so-called prime loans. They made up about a fifth of all 
new mortgages last year, according to the Washington-based Mortgage Bankers 
Association. 

      Subprime Turmoil 

      At least 20 lenders have shut down, scaled back or been sold this year. 
Countrywide Financial Corp., the biggest U.S. mortgage lender, yesterday said 
borrowers were at least 30 days past due at the end of last year on almost a 
fifth of the subprime loans that it serviced for others. 

      ``There's been a little bit of a reappraisal of the financial sector, 
with a strong desire to get away from subprime exposure,'' said Scott 
MacDonald, director of research at Aladdin Capital Management LLC in Stamford, 
Connecticut, which manages $16.5 billion in assets. 

      Merrill equity analysts two days ago cut their recommendations on 
Goldman, Lehman and Bear Stearns shares as well as that of European banks 
Deutsche Bank and Credit Suisse Group to ``neutral'' from ``buy'' because they 
said earnings will probably decline next month as investors become wary. 

      Bear Stearns's stake in non-investment grade retained mortgage 
securities, or what its keeps from packaging loans into bonds, represents about 
13 percent of the firm's ``tangible'' equity, according to CreditSights. 

      For Lehman, it's 11 percent. Goldman, Morgan Stanley and Merrill don't 
disclose how much of their total retained securities are rated below investment 
grade, or junk. Overall, their exposure is in ``the low- to mid-teens,'' 
CreditSights said. 

      Disclosure `Lacking' 

      ``Disclosures are kind of lacking,'' Hofmann at CreditSights said in an 
interview. ``They don't tend to break out the subprime piece of their retained 
interest.'' 

      Losses also may come from the banks' trading in mortgage bonds and 
derivatives tied to them, the firm said. An index of derivatives based on 20 
mortgage securities rated BBB- and created in the second half of last year has 
fallen by more than a third since last month. 

      Companies with similar gaps between their actual rankings and ratings 
implied by credit-default swap levels have outperformed their peers 87 percent 
of the time over a one-year horizon, he said. Because an active credit swaps 
market has existed for less than a decade, that percentage is based on only 37 
observations, Munves at Moody's said. 

      At the same time, the same companies had an above-average risk of being 
downgraded, with about 22 percent of them having their ratings cut, he said. 

      To contact the reporter for this story: Shannon D. Harrington in New York 
at [EMAIL PROTECTED] . 

      Last Updated: March 2, 2007 10:08 EST 



       


     
       Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Trademarks  



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to