Today in the U.S.A. there is suposedly taxation with representation. 
I say supposedly because there is this idea that elected politicians 
represent the interests of those who elected them. Pershaps they do 
represent some of those who elected them but generally they 
represent those who got them elected via campaign contributions. 
Also those who did not vote for them generally don't think they the 
pols who got elected are representing their interests. Many who 
voted for the winners of elections may not get what they want even 
if the candidate they voted for wins and keeps his or her promise to 
do or not do what their voters wanted because there are other 
members of congress who will vote against them. Some people think 
that taxation with representation is better than taxation without 
representation. If one is opposed to a particular tax then how does 
the fact that the people who voted for the particular tax were voted 
into office by some who may support the tax make it ok for those who 
are in opposition to the tax? Suppose you vote for a candidate who 
campaigns on a promise of not voting to increases taxes. Even if 
that candidate is elected and does not vote for tax increases that 
does not garantee there will be no tax increases because the 
majority of the other members of congress might vote for tax 
increases. Today in the U.S.A. the American people are taxed more 
than ever and they supposedly have taxation with representation. The 
Americans of 18th century colonial America who rebeled against 
taxation without representation were taxed far less than Americans 
are today. Today under the system of supposedly taxation with 
representation americans are forced by government to pay for things 
they not only don't want to pay for but things that the government 
is not authorized to spend monies from the treasury on. Just because 
a member of congress was elected does not mean that it is ok for him 
or her to spend monies from the treasury on things that the 
Constitution does not authorize congress to spend monies on or to 
spend monies in ways that many Americans do not approve of. Congress 
should only spend monies on what the Constitution specifically 
authorizes. Also American soldiers should not be engaging in warfare 
unless Congress has issued a declaration of war that nearly all 
members have voted in favor of and only when war is justified to 
defend the country.

                  $

Reply via email to