Chris, the problem you identify is attributable to govt drug 
prohibition; which consumes the majority of America's criminal-
justice systems!  

Repeat violent offenders (domestic or imports) are released from 
incarceration to make room for the artifacts of govt drug 
prohibition.   

Your 'remedy' of scapegoating all 'illegal' migrants for the sins of 
some is unprincipled collectivism and ignores the actual cause of 
most real crime in America.  


-TLP




--- In [email protected], Chris fields 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> As an example they could be or they could be terrorists or 
psychopath Christians. Here's an example in Columbia TN there was an 
illegal that was arrested 11 times and the last time he was released 
on bail he raped a 15 year old girl 3 hours after getting out.
> 
> That's a 15 year old that wouldn't have been raped at least not 
then if that illegal was deported.
> 
> mani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:                                  If your 
basis is that illegal aliens could be serial killers, my
>  job is done.
>  
>  +++++++++++++++++++++
>  
>  Chris fields wrote: 
>  No but ILLEGAL immigrants do represent a threat to us and could
>  even encompass that of a serial killer. If we don't know who they
>  are or what they're capable of.
>  
>  mani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  
>  Chris,
>   
>   I agree, but what does a serial killer have to do with this
>   conversation? Will you be showing that unapproved migrants are
>   serial killers? Until then, a serial killer is a red herring; a
>   straw man argument; a distraction; a gross misrepresentation; a
>   false analogy. At this juncture, it appears you not refute my
>   original point without resorting to an off-topic desperation
>   tactic. 
>   
>   ++++++++++++++++++++
>   
>   Chris fields wrote:
>   
>   If you have a serial killer preying on citizens of a
>  neighborhood
>   you'd have to punish him in order to restore the peace and
>  safety
>   of those affected.
>   
>   mani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>   
>   Chris,
>    
>    Now you stretch the definition of "restoring" to mean
>    "punishing". To "punish" is to "blame". In light of that, you
>   are
>    not blaming the cause. 
>    
>    
>   
>   
>  
>  
>      
>                        
> 
>        
> ---------------------------------
> Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect.  Join Yahoo!'s 
user panel and lay it on us.
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>


Reply via email to