Chris, distraction over wild desperate conspiracy theories about 'secret plans' aside, can you describe your concept of the difference between PUBLIC and PRIVATE property?
This question is the essence of understanding the peril of National Socialism in America. -TLP --- In [email protected], chris fields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thats exactly what the others are advocating! Open borders at this point would bring us closer to a loss of distinction then designating an area that will remain free from the outside worlds bullshit. Theres a quote i like it says trade with all ally with none. The fact that Mexico deports more people then the US does yet still jumps on our case to allow their citizens to stay here should say something. The richest guy in the world is a Mexican now yet a significant percentage of Mexicans are living below the poverty line. > > This plan of the Mexican elite is merely an attempt to bring more money into their economy while they drain that economy dry. We've seen how screwed up this administration is and how screwed up the Mexican government is and the fact that they support this should tell us something. Back in the 1800's open borders were great! because of equal economies. Mexican people should take what belongs to them from their government instead of fueling a corrupt government by coming here and sending money back to Mexico to be spent in Mexico to wind up in the pocket of the elite in....MEXICO! Open borders would create instability and riots which would give King Bush a reason to declare martial law and become a dictator as per his presidential directive may 9th of this year. You can read it at the whitehouse press page online or i can post it but its scary as hell. > > This may not be the plan but every possible scenario i can think of is extremely negative for the people and only beneficial to the elite. One big happy world sounds great until you realize that it is not possible anymore there are too many greedy people in power. > Terry L Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Chris, do you REALLY want to be advocating for loss of distinction > between public and private property ownership; ie, National > Socialism? > > -TLP > > --- In [email protected], chris fields > <wastedwhiteguy6978@> wrote: > > > > No but a country does provide a home and like a house one should > feel secure in their country at least to a reasonable degree. Also > like a house the economy of this country was built. Basically a house > is a home within a home. > > > > Susan Hogarth <hogarth@> wrote: > > Susan Hogarth <hogarth@> > wrote: > Susan Hogarth > <hogarth@> wrote: On 7/5/07, > chris fields <wastedwhiteguy6978@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > If you want to be happy you do what you have to to be > happy....Plainly put if your family was responsible for a beautiful > thing would you not be proud of it? Our ancestors created this > country we should be damn proud to be a part of it. > > > > > > > > Oh, I am. So proud I want to share it with anyone who > would like to > > > > join me here. > > > On 7/5/07, chris fields <wastedwhiteguy6978@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Then you wouldn't mind if a few dozen illegals moved into > your place of residence as well and demanded you support them? > Eventually you'll be pushed out onto the street but hey you're > sharing your home and you should be proud. > > > > > > Try reading more carefully. I never suggested I wanted to > share my > > > house. A country is not a house. I am the rightful owner of my > house. > > > I am not the owner of the country. > > > > > > Remember: a country is not a house. > > > > On 7/6/07, chris fields <wastedwhiteguy6978@> wrote: > > > > > > No but you and i both are responsible for the economy and the > society in that country. > > > > No we are not.Society (and economy) are descriptions of the > > interrelationships between individuals. The only way you can 'be > > responsible for' either one is to control the actions of > individuals. > > But you have no right to control my actions. Ergo, you have no > right - > > let alone *responsibility* to control 'society' or 'the economy'. > > > > > Americans do own America we pay taxes so it is the same thing. > > > > No. Actually it's not. > > > > -- > > Susan Hogarth > > http://www.colliething.com > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------- > > Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your pocket: > mail, news, photos & more. > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------- > Pinpoint customers who are looking for what you sell. > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
