A Review of the book:
"Universally Preferable Behavior: A Rational Proof of Secular Ethics", 
by Stefan Molyneux of: http://www.freedomainradio.com

By Eugene, of: http://www.LessGovernment.com

Universally Preferable Behaviour: A Rational Proof of Secular Ethics,
by Stefan Molyneux, is a difficult work to summarize without "giving
it away," so to speak. Since this is a book I believe every human
being who breathes and thinks should read, here I will briefly attempt
to react to the ideas therein without overtly rehashing them in an
unbecoming manner.

First of all, it should be noted that Mr. Molyneux has crammed an
enormous amount of material into a relatively short book (223 pages,
including the index and all appendices). The writing style, fluid and
swift, manages a good pace that simultaneously does not seem hurried
or lacking in detail. Complex ideas are put forth and explored in a
clear, concise, refreshing manner that many nonfiction philosophy
writers should take note of.

Aesthetically, the layout of the book is very clean, even offering a
point-by-point summary of ideas toward the end. On a more personal
note, many of Molyneux's descriptions and explanations are
extraordinarily hilarious, and I suspect some of this is just natural
humor rather than blatant attempts to be funny. Or maybe it's just my
own eccentricity. At any rate, a dull slog through some forbidden
philosophical swamp this is not. If you have a pulse, you should
recognize the entertainment value of this work — and that says a lot,
given the serious subject matter, a testament to the author's adept
employment of the English language.

My only real complaint centers on occasional lines that refer to
something mentioned "above," when in fact what is being referred to
occurred many pages or sections back. While in word processor form,
such references certainly pertain to something that occurred "above,"
but this is not so in printed form. As such, I had a few moments of
slight confusion as I scanned toward the top of a page in search of
something, but I eventually got used to it. Anyway, this is a minor
point of contention over an arguably irrelevant detail. Someone else
might not even notice.

Not counting the introductory sections, UPB is divided into three
parts: Theory, Application and Practice. "Part I: Theory" establishes
the Universally Preferable Behavior framework by using logic and with
a complete regard for known hang-ups, such as Hume's is/ought
dichotomy and the bottomless pit known as utilitarianism.

"Part II: Application" tests the UPB framework by examining a number
of ethical scenarios (rape, murder, theft, fraud and lying).
Obviously, the UPB concept would be immediately suspect if it were to
conclude, for instance, that rape and murder are good (universally
preferable) behaviors. Thus Molyneux's approach of first using his
system to verify some of the values already held by most humans is a
great place to start.

"Part III: Practice" delves into the "null zone," a realm between
"little truths" and "great truths" where nonexistent entities are
allowed to completely rewrite or ignore reality. These entities are,
of course, usually gods and governments, and Molyneux gives no quarter
as these fanciful constructs are exposed for what they really are.

The entire approach is extremely rational, and some readers might find
themselves fascinated as they begin in Theory, where ethics are
initially assumed to not exist, and behold the gradual process of
reasoning which produces the UPB framework. Per Molyneux's intention,
it becomes no more sane to call ethical propositions "relative" or
"subjective" than to say the same of mathematics or the scientific
method. We know two and two equal four, not five, and we know "murder
is good" to be logically invalid. Further, two and two equal four
regardless of what uniform a person wears, and "murder is good"
remains invalid without respect to a person's race, title or
professional affiliation.

Early on, the author refers to philosophy's "greatest beast," a
seemingly unconquerable monster that has bested thinker after thinker
through the ages. I am certainly not qualified to determine whether
the behemoth of secular ethics has at last met its end, and even
Molyneux himself seems hesitant to make premature pronouncements of
success, as he reveals prior to Part I.

    "Whether I have succeeded ... is not up to you, and it is not up
to me. If the reasoning holds, the greatest beast is down." (Molyneux,
UPB, pg. 16)

Nonetheless, it is this layman's opinion that said beast is, at best,
quivering on a cavern floor as it clings tenuously to life. If it
survives, it will be only through a lame retreat into the "null zone,"
where down is up, gravity makes things fall skyward, and two plus two
make five.

Having read a great deal of material from many writers — Rand,
Rothbard, Nozick, Stirner, Nietzsche, and others — I can say without a
doubt that Stefan Molyneux has presented one of the most coherent and
accessible explorations of philosophy one is likely to ever encounter.
In fact, his UPB framework has been derived in such a consistent,
logical manner that anyone who opposes it will be hard-pressed to do
so without implicitly agreeing to it. When even your most vicious
opponents are required to accept your premise before arguing against
your position, you may be reasonably certain that you've done
something right.

Universally Preferable Behaviour: A Rational Proof of Secular Ethics
has the potential to be earth-shaking. The fact that it has been
released as print-on-demand through Lulu is both a blessing and a
curse — a blessing because this most excellent work is available at
all, but a curse because the potential audience is limited to the
author's advertising capacity and that of readers. Nonetheless, while
this can directly affect the dissemination of ideas, it has no bearing
on the brilliance of the work itself. Perhaps, with time, this book
will have a chance to herald the philosophical revolution that, in my
opinion, it is truly capable of bringing about.

-----

Special thanks goes to Mr. Molyneux for generously providing a copy of
Universally Preferable Behaviour: A Rational Proof of Secular Ethics
for review.

Stefan Molyneux's books, Podcasts, articles and message board are all
available on his website, Freedomain Radio.


Reply via email to