Hi, If you thought Part 1 was scary, wait until you get to the two minute point of this clip.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XmPeXKlq3TQ Those who question the events of 911 may be terrorists. Are you getting the big picture? Question authority or, in this case, the authorities version of 911, and you can be labeled a terrorist. Wake Up. Look around. Someone has been building a huge fence and it is not to keep the terrorist out. Now, order some DVD's http://www.onedollardvdproject.com then, push away from the computer and contemplate what this means. If you question the official version of 911 you can be labeled a enemy non-combatant, rounded up and made to disappear into a military gulag with no hope to have a lawyer or trial. I purposely left out the torture issue. Is your blood boiling or, are you starting to shut down? There are three kinds of folks: Those that make it happen. Those that watch it happen. Those that wonder what happened. Solzhenitsyn on resisting tyranny It was Alexander Solzhenitsyn, the Russian writer, who made the "gulag archipelago" part of our language. American Gulag... Coming Soon [EXCERPT] . . . What did Solzhenitsyn say about the gulag? "At what exact point, then, should one resist? When one's belt is taken away. When one is ordered to face into a corner? When one crosses the threshold of one's home? . . . ." The same questions that are bothering you now. Solzhenitsyn bitterly laments the Russian failure to resist: "And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand? . . ." Apparently, they had no guns. Solzhenitsyn does not mention them. But he believes that axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else they had, could have done the job. He continues: ". . . After all, you knew ahead of time that those bluecaps were out at night for no good purpose. And you could be sure ahead of time that you,d be cracking the skull of a cutthroat. Or what about the Black Maria sitting out there on the street with one lonely chauffeur"what if it had been driven off or its tires spiked? The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt!" One is reminded of "Death Wish," starring the late Charles Bronson. The architect hero was not a terrorist, i.e., he did not kill indiscriminately. He did not kill the innocent. He was mild, even harmless, until the guilty attacked. Then, he brought out the hog leg and went to work. Whenever he did so, the theater audience cheered. Acting alone, he turned New York on its ear. Other inmates, inspired, began to do the same. Criminals were indignant. Didn't these New Yorkers know that packing heat was illegal? Crime fell. Imagine the effect of an epidemic of Bronsons. That is what Russians should have done, says Solzhenitsyn. Of course, they didn't do it. They "burned in the camps later" lamenting that fact: "If . . . if . . . We didn't love freedom enough. And even more - we had no awareness of the real situation. . . . We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward." They lost everything because they were too cowardly to act. . . They might take my property, they might take my life but, they will never take my God given spirit of liberty and freedom. Now, please, go look into your children's eyes. Ron http://www.onedollardvdproject.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
