Yet, the FBI thinks not. You keep ignoring these contentions, and the documentation to back them up, and keep repeating the same failed contentions over and over to support your blood lust (in fact that is generally the ploy of propagandist, though I'm certainly not saying you are). In fact, what the Taliban said (at least the ones that didn't go to work for us), was they would like to see some proof that Bin Laden had anything to do with 911. So, any other civilized country who made such a request would be what? Invaded? If that was the way international law worked, then we would have invaded every country on the face of the earth, at one time or the other. You or the administration's excuses just never hold up.
Goat Bob Giramma wrote: > The 9/11 attack came from a terrorist group based in Afghanistan. The > Taliban government was offered the opportunity to turn over the al Qaeda > leadership for prosecution, but they refused, thereby assuming guilt by > association and complicity. > > BTW, the US was the leading contributor of humanitarian aid to the Afghan > people, providing more than half of all such international funding. > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 8:19 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Libertarian] Digest Number 4544 > > > > In a message dated 6/2/2008 6:50:52 A.M. Central Daylight Time, > [email protected] writes: > > In the case of Afghanistan, the war was a justifiable act of self- > defense. > > But the 9-11 highjackers were mostly Saudis. Did Afghanistan attack us? > > **************Get trade secrets for amazing burgers. Watch "Cooking with > Tyler Florence" on AOL Food. > (http://food.aol.com/tyler-florence?video=4&?NCID=aolfod00030000000002) > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > ------------------------------------ > > ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links >
