where she witnessed the manner in which the individual was criminalized for the 
most trivial excuse...and visiting dignitaries from Scotland Yard envied their 
power...and we are coming to this in America where we have to choose whether 
the authorities serve us or we are criminalized by them...
http://tmh.floonet.net/articles/lane.html
 
Thanks Wendy McElroy for the website.

 
"Democracy: Two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch!!!"  Restore 
the Republic, RON PAUL for President

links: http://www.quicksitemaker.com/members/sandsgeniuses/ 
http://www.quicksitemaker.com/members/rdwdtreewoman/
BLOGS: http://mejane100.wordpress.com/2007/10/26/hello-world/ 
http://blog.bobbeck.com/, http://mejane11.wordpress.com/



----- Original Message ----
From: Bob Giramma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, June 9, 2008 12:08:58 PM
Subject: Re: [Libertarian] What's Relevant About Islam?


Yes, I am aware of that logical fallacy. It is uncorrelated with the truth. To 
avoid that problem, I researched sources that look at original language, 
historical relevance, and theocratic interpretations. What else do you expect 
me to do? Should I just be a good lemming and follow whatever you say?

From: ma ni 
Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2008 11:48 PM
To: Libertarian@ yahoogroups. com 
Subject: RE: [Libertarian] What's Relevant About Islam?

ad populum 

http://en.wikipedia .org/wiki/ Argumentum_ ad_populum

------------ --------- ---------

What I tried to say -- and apparently didn't do very well -- is
that I corresponded with, spoke to, and researched several
sources, all of whom said the Biblical verse in question does not
sanction slavery. That was their opinion. I am not
theologically competent enough to determine who is right or
wrong. But so far, you are the only person I can find who claims
the Bible sanctions slavery.

I have indeed heard such claims in the past, but you are the
first person who has motivated me to research it a bit. Thank
you teacher.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to