Oh really!? Well if you think the military should go after anyone who commits acts of aggression and makes the stock market drop, you'll need to declare war on GWB.
Your statements about liberty and libertarianism are contradictory to your statements about drug-war crime and environmental determinism. You blame drug dealers for blaming prohibition, yet libertarianism blames all forms of systematic aggression. It's a hypocritical double-standard for you to fight against your own persecution, but criticize others for doing the same thing. You call their fight: "allowing their environment to influence their free will". You call yours: a "Fight for Liberty!" --------------------------- --- In [email protected], "ma ni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Tim Starr, > >So other than stock market losses, your total is around $50B. >Shall the US proceed to go to war against the next thing >responsible for a big drop in the market? If it is an act of aggression, yes. >If you minimize drug-war crime as "environmental determinism"... 1) I'm not "minimizing" it. 2) Environmental determinism is simply wrong, just like all denials of free will. >why are you a libertarian? Because I love freedom, and want to maximize it, because that makes for the greatest happiness, peace, and prosperity. Tim Starr Fight for Liberty! http://groups.yahoo.com/group/fightforliberty/ ------------------------------------
