MODERATOR'S NOTE: I'm note sure why Jane choose to use the phrase 
"DUHHH?!?!?!!?!" after her statement that "abortion should be left to the 
states".

Why should ANY Government have a right to regulate abortion?

Why should ANY Government have a right to regulate ANYTHING?

Why should ANY Government have a right to EXIST?

Since there are so many unanswered questions the phrase "DUHHH?!?!?!!?!" just 
doesn't apply here.

---Sasan

------------------------------------------------------------

Abortion should be left to the states, should not be a federal issue, and it is 
none of federal business...they have only two purposes, to protect individual 
rights and secure national defense...DUHHH?!?!?!!?!
 
"Business is Great...People are Terrific...Life is Wonderful!!!"  
Libertarian RON PAUL for Pres...If you bought it a truck brought it...Drill 
Here!!!

links: http://www.quicksitemaker.com/members/sandsgeniuses/
http://www.quicksitemaker.com/members/rdwdtreewoman/
BLOGS: http://mejane100.wordpress.com/2007/10/26/hello-world/
http://blog.bobbeck.com/, http://mejane11.wordpress.com/



----- Original Message ----
From: Bob Giramma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 11:05:28 PM
Subject: Re: [Libertarian] The (Ron) Paul-O-Meter


Yes, there's quite a lot of subjectivity in something like this. And as someone 
noted earlier, this compares the candidates with Ron Paul, not majority 
libertarian opinion. Ron Paul deviates from majority libertarian views in 
several areas, including immigration and abortion.

But still, as an LP member, I'm pleased to see Bob Barr score very close to Ron 
Paul, who, while not perfect, is about as libertarian as someone can be and 
still get TV airtime. Barr and Root have a good enough combination of clout and 
charisma to possibly get more airtime for us.

From: kiddleddee
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 3:57 PM
To: Libertarian@ yahoogroups. com
Subject: [Libertarian] Re: The (Ron) Paul-O-Meter

--- In Libertarian@ yahoogroups. com, "Bob Giramma" <evil_spock@ ...>
wrote:
>
> Someone developed a method of quantifying how close (or far) a
presidential candidate is to the positions of Ron Paul. Bob Barr and
Chuck Baldwin tie for first with 88 out of a possible 99 score. Nader
gets 26, McCain 25, McKinney 20, and Obama 17.
____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _

It is actually easy to get a "high" score when the scorers misrepresent
your positions to be more libertarian than they actually have been.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to