On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 11:40 PM, Chris Edes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Susan Hogarth wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 8:36 PM, Chris Edes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >>> ... >>> Last I heard Executive Outcomes didn't do charity work. Who will >>> protect the natural rights of the poor? >> >> ???! >> >> Governments don't 'do charity work', either. They transfer wealth >> forcibly from a large group of people to a smaller group of people. > > The assertion was that a mercenary group (Executive Outcomes) does a > better job of protection than government. Perhaps it does. Yet how > will those who cannot afford private security receive justice?
How will those who can't afford 'public justice' get it? Perhaps have (a bit of) itdoled out to them in exchange for supporting the thieves who provide it? How is that 'justice', exactly? Justice is a good like any other. There is no guarantee in this world that you will be fed, or clothed, or recieve justice. That's not an excuse for stealing, though. -- Susan Hogarth | Get Free! Libertarian for NC State House 38 http://hogarth4house.com/
