Another stumbling block seems to be who gets Jersulem. Maybe an
answer would be to make it an Indepedent city state I don't know.---
In [email protected], steven r linnabary <linnabar...@...>
wrote:
>
> Interesting, I suppose.
> But a proposal destined to fail before it gets off the ground.
>
> 1. I don't believe the Israeli's will ever give up Samaria and
Judea (they
> are "integral and inseparable")
> 2. I don't believe that Israel would accept Jordanian soldiers on
the West
> Bank.
> 3. The entire equation leaves out Iran. Purportedly, Israel
believes that
> Iran is the chief promulgator of violence and Terrorism.
> 4. The plan also depends on Hamas and Fatah merging into a single
entity.
>
> Other than not being realistic, it is a good plan. The only thing
that
> makes it realistic is that Thomas Friedman has proposed it.
>
> PEACE
> Steve
>
> On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 4:52 PM, Edwin J. Pole II
<ejpol...@...>wrote:
>
> > http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/28/opinion/28friedman.html?_r=1
> >
> > This is an interesting proposal by Thomas Friedman. I offer it for
> > comment.
> >
> > Ed$
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
