--- On Fri, 1/15/10, Scott Bidstrup <[email protected]> wrote:

>From: Scott Bidstrup <[email protected]>
>Subject: Cuba is Missing - Or Is It?
>Date: Friday, January 15, 2010, 11:01 PM
>
>
>All,
>
>Cuba is missing, alright, primarily from the list of nations to which the 
>Fawning Corporate Media in the United States is willing to pay respect.
>
>What it is not missing from, is the list of first responder nations to the 
>Haiti emergency.  Contrary to what Fox News has reported, it has not only 
>responded by sending medical help, but it was one of the first to do so.  
>Cuba, hit frequently by hurricanes as it is, knows how to deal with 
>emergencies, and is doing so very effectively.  It was one of the first to 
>land medical help into the affected area, having sent 30 in addition to the 
>400 it already had there.
>
>And its people have responded - I know, because I can listen (7045 Khz.) to 
>the efforts of the ham radio operators in Cuba, providing emergency 
>communications into the affected area - and doing so with more efficiency and 
>effectiveness than anyone else, including such experienced U.S. groups
> as the Salvation Army.
>
>Scott
>
>====
>
>Cuba is Missing...From US Reports on the International Response to Haiti’s 
>Earthquake
>Dave Lindorff
>
>http://www.smirkingchimp.com/thread/26095
>
>There are only two US media outlets that have reported on Cuba’s response to 
>the deadly 7.0 earthquake that hit Haiti. One was Fox News, which claimed, 
>wrongly, that the Cubans were absent from the list of neighboring Caribbean 
>countries providing aid. The other was the Christian Science Monitor (a 
>respected news organization that recently shut down its print edition), which 
>reported correctly that Cuba had dispatched 30 doctors to the stricken nation.
>
>The Christian Science Monitor, in a second article, quoted Laurence Korb, 
>former assistant secretary of defense and now based at the Center for American 
>Progress, as saying that the US, which is leading the relief
> efforts in Haiti, should “consider tapping the expertise of neighboring 
> Cuba,” which he noted, “has some of the best doctors in the world--we should 
> see about flying them in.”
>
>As for the rest of the US media, they have simply ignored Cuba.
>
>In fact, left unmentioned is the reality that Cuba already had over 400 
>doctors posted to Haiti to help with the day-to-day health needs of this 
>poorest nation in the Americas, and that those doctors were the first to 
>respond to the disaster, setting up a hospital right next to the main hospital 
>in Port-au-Prince which collapsed in the earthquake.
>
>Far from “doing nothing” about the disaster as the right-wing propagandists at 
>Fox-TV were claiming, Cuba has been one of the most effective and critical 
>responders to the crisis, because it had set up a medical infrastructure 
>before the quake, which was able to mobilize quickly and start treating the 
>victims.
>
>The American emergency
> response, predictably, has focussed primarily, at least in terms of personnel 
> and money, on sending the hugely costly and inefficient US military--a fleet 
> of aircraft and an aircraft carrier--a factor that should be considered when 
> examining that $100 million figure the Obama administration claims is being 
> allocated to emergency aid to Haiti. Considering that the cost of operating 
> an aircraft carrier, including crew, is roughly $2 million a day, just 
> sending a carrier to Port-au-Prince for two weeks accounts for a quarter of 
> the announced American aid effort, and while many of the military personnel 
> sent there will certainly be doing actual aid work, delivering supplies and 
> guarding supplies, many, given America’s long history of brutal 
> military/colonial control of Haiti, will inevitably be spending their time 
> ensuring continued survival and control of the parasitic pro-US political 
> elite in Haiti.
>
>Otherwise, the US has basically ignored the
> ongoing day-to-day human crisis in Haiti, while Cuba has been doing the 
> yeoman work of providing basic health care.
>
>But that’s not a story that the American corporate media want to tell.
> 





      

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to