"Prohibited"?  "Allowed"?  Goodness no!  Everything must be AGREED to in an 
agreement.
Agreement is the basis of free enterprise. Legislation, by contrast,  makes 
unilateral prohibitions and specifies what it "allows".
Contracts record what buyer and seller both agree on.  Everything must be OK 
with both sides in a contract.

Engineers usually want identifying logos on PCBs.  Like the implicit agreement 
that your home is not a billboard,
manufacturers are assumed to identify their parts.  The implicit understanding 
in the industry makes it appropriate or not.
This has nothing at all to do with "free speech".

The government was cheated by a contractor who secretly inscribed biblical 
references on the outside of weapons.
The government was cheated because the government never agreed to that.
This was no mistake because the government cannot legally agree to putting 
religious references on its property.
That was the violation of the First Amendment, freedom of religion.


Harland Harrison
LP of San Mateo County CA




----- Message d'origine ----
De : Bob Giramma <[email protected]>
À : [email protected]
Envoyé le : Mar 26 Janvier 2010, 17 h 02 min 18 s
Objet : Re: [Libertarian] US gov't has Bible verses on military weapons

Sure, but I told the painter I wanted my house painted a solid color #1923, so 
the contract precludes ads or other statements.  It might not be stated in the 
contract, but it's an implicit agreement.  The painter did post a lawn sign 
advertising his services while he was painting, and I could have demanded he 
remove it.

Different and more applicable case:  I work in the electronics industry.  
Sometimes electronic board or chip engineers will put a message on their 
designs.  Tear open some devices, and you might be able to see such things.  
The company buying the boards usually doesn't bother specifying that there be 
no messages.  But they can.

You seem to be saying that everything not specified in the contract or 
agreement is prohibited.  That's an authoritarian approach to business.  I say 
everything not specified is allowed.  The buyer can re-specify or refuse to do 
business.


From: Harland Harrison 
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 12:17 PM
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re : [Libertarian] US gov't has Bible verses on military weapons


  
That idea is so silly that I doubt you actually believe it. The painter cannot 
paint advertisements on your house. GM cannot recall your car to paint ads all 
over it. Your sales contract does not say anything about GM "giving up" that 
right. It doesn't have to. Everybody knows that when you sell something the 
"free speech" on it, as you call it, goes to the buyer with the bill of sale.

Contract law is based on agreement. Written contracts are, legally, just 
records of what the parties agreed to do. The government could not have agreed 
to some condition that nobody knew about, especially since that condition would 
not even be legal. Nobody thinks a seller normally retains the right to 
advertise third party messages on a custom-made product. A specific exclusion 
does not need to be in the contract because both parties understand.

Harland Harrison
LP of San Mateo County CA

----- Message d'origine ----
De : Bob Giramma <[email protected]>
À : [email protected]
Envoyé le : Lun 25 Janvier 2010, 20 h 34 min 47 s
Objet : Re: [Libertarian] US gov't has Bible verses on military weapons

Yes, same thing. Free speech unless otherwise specified by contract. 

I am not interested in the Biblical phrase. I am interested in freedom, which 
can only be taken through consent of the seller in this case.

From: ma ni 
Sent: Monday, January 25, 2010 7:16 PM
To: [email protected] 
Subject: RE: [Libertarian] US gov't has Bible verses on military weapons

If the inscription said "Praise be to Allah and Muhammad", would
those here who are so tolerant of the biblical phrase be just as
tolerant?

-------------------------

I have some Trijicon night sights and I never noticed anything.

If there is an inscription that nobody notices, does it
actually interrupt the silence of a forest gunfight?

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links




      

Reply via email to