The Wounding Glory: The historical analysis of the state, society, religion, 
active forces, scientific developments, and the people in the world 
 
In a comparison of Indian civilization prior and during the rig Vedic period, 
with the civilizations of Egypt, Sumerian, Akkadian, Mesopotamian and Urr, the 
origin and complete form of the “state” in India there was no strong form of 
the state at the time. The complete form and shape of the state it was not yet 
taken while the Greeks king Dario us, and Alexander who took expedition of 
winning the territories of India under any Indian kings materially except in 
the form of Indian mythology which claims that the state was in origin and has 
taken its expansion from India to all parks of the world particularly in the 
gulf areas too, by keeping in mind the Vikramaditya the great king of that 
time  whose period also stated to be corrupted with a contention to keep him 
above all the kings and their dynasties in the world. “God the invisible King” 
as the presumption has the relation with the kingship and the god whose role 
and act to save the people as
 a protector, savior and benevolent towards the poor in the world could be the 
factor behind the origin of the state in all the civilizations in materialistic 
way and in India the first god who has been well known in the Rig-Veda which is 
the first source of the history in India and its location of rig Vedic 
civilization is identified with the river Saraswati which was dried up. In rig 
Vedic kings list there were so many kings and whose actual physical proof not 
yet established in the sense and true meaning of material facts other than 
spiritual or mythological beliefs in India. Archaeological evidences in absence 
of which all these would never be treated as the kings in the history of the 
kings. However if it is established that all the kings were existed on the 
banks of five rivers by any authority either through the department of 
archaeology or by any credible research work it will become the believable 
facts and the facts in the space of mythology as
 the history of India with the list of kings. Hence the history of India in 
relation to the origin, evolution and  taking complete shape of powerful state, 
foreign kings were took opportunity to rule the country for so many years and 
left their foot prints on the soils of India and it has its influence and 
affect on the common ideology of the people and has been played a part in 
molding the nature of the people of India since the period came to know to the 
history of the things and existence of the kings with the relation of the 
spirituality and mythology to the present form of the state in India. As Hegel 
claimed that the Egyptian and Indian gods has nearest relation in natural gods 
and the people of these two countries. After Dario us and Alexander the great, 
the first in terms of power and strength of its military might, the 
Chandragupta Mourya, basing on the capital city, Patna he has taken complete 
form of the state in India, before whom no one was
 come into being like him in India and much less in his power in small groups 
like a war lords were there in the tribal belts of the country and could not 
raised to his level in the might. The period of Rig Vedic civilization is 
stated to be existed around 1000-1500 BC. There is no unanimous opinion of the 
exact date of Vedic civilization in India. The period of Chandragupta Mourya is 
claimed to be 321-297 BC. As the first historical book, bible, in its Old 
Testament genesis, the king claimed the first king in the world is Enlil from 
Sumerian civilization which was around 3rd millennium. The Sumarian records 
also confirmed the kings list in which Enlil was the first king in the kings 
list. The names of the first kings and their kingships in comparison with the 
bible and Rig-Veda in the both mythological and archaeological accounts, 
whatever the evidences of the Rig-Veda and bible confirmed and convinced with 
the available findings it is here the facts in
 identifying the origin and transformation of the state to notify the 
developments and factors behind the state in different regions in the world. 
Language in which the bible is written first is Hebrew and the Rig-Veda is 
written in Sanskrit. It is the fact that the bible is the first book known for 
the subjects of origin of state, religion, and other issues in the history and 
it has been proving in so many subjects through the archaeological evidences 
since last two hundred years. Hence it is fact that the origin and its leading 
factors behind the origin of the state are very different from each other 
particularly in India from its early periods of the origin of the state in the 
Sumarian now modern Iraq, civilization. At the same time the form, need, 
leading factors, and the materialistic support behind the powerful state in 
iraq and in India is very different and do not have any direct link and same 
factors in all such origins of each state in all
 ancient civilizations in the world. At the same time, when the need and 
factors in leading the people to feel the need of the state and the social 
conditions of these societies are different there is no unanimity in the 
features of all states in its early periods of its transformation from the 
nominal force to the powerful force in the shape of state particularly in India 
in caparison with other states’ origin and transformation. There is the gap of 
at least 1000 years to 1500 years between the periods of states origin in these 
two civilizations in the world we can till now because there are no such 
archaeological supports in reversing the periods on the timeline of the world 
civilizations. For those in India whose mother tongue is other than Sanskrit 
language, the British who translated the four Vedas, including Rig-Veda, from 
to English are max Muller, and Griffith and they would be grateful to them for 
all time.
 
In the Indian history the most striking and positive feature is that the state 
has not been worked under any influence of the religion, particularly Hinduism, 
at the same time the Buddhism also did not allow the religion in the states 
affairs from the formation of the religion and the as identified in the Vedas, 
Upanishads and other historical books including Ramayana and Mahabharata. The 
Europeans, Romans and British who were during the middle ages allowed the 
church to dominate the state and decide the state affairs through the church in 
the society. The church-state relations were in the legalized form under the 
domination of the church over the state and its affairs whereas the temple in 
India to which few acres lands were allotted to run the affairs of the state in 
the mostly recognized form independence from each other. The Brahmans were only 
allowed in the occasions of the royal ceremonies and allowed them only to 
confine themselves in the service
 of the temple and people with some little gifts offered by the people on the 
name of god here in India. So the history and origin of the state in India is 
very different one from the other civilizations from which the state and 
religion took birth. So the history of India and the other states history is 
not same one and Indian history have a special attention to dig out and apply 
it to the present conditions of Indian society in order to find the exact phase 
of passage of society towards further advancement through identifying the pace 
and its pulse to confirm what stage we all Indians have to move towards 
progress and development including understanding the exact conditions of moving 
the other developed states to where exactly these have to reach through the 
progress and development in true sense and understanding of the stages of 
capitalism in the
 world.                                                                        
Ayub Mohammed
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/political_analysts/


      Your Mail works best with the New Yahoo Optimized IE8. Get it NOW! 
http://downloads.yahoo.com/in/internetexplorer/

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to