one has to be careful not to privatize those services that are an
absolute necessity for any person's pursuit of livelihood and
success. 

if a system calls for a continuum of sorts, as well as an
essential need, then it becomes a dangerous proposition to
surrender it to privatization, 

-------------------------
Then I guess we better turn all production and distribution of
food and shelter and clothing over to government.
-------------------------

If water were to be privatized, we'd all be thirsty as hell.
Unless  
we want to pay the private owner who is making a pile of money on

this privatized essential need that nobody can live without.

-------------------------
Water IS privatized. In fact, the only reason the private owner
IS getting rich selling one of the most abundant natural
resources is because government-supplied water is typically of
such lousy quality. Every day millions choose to buy bottled
drinking water rather than drink the dank stuff that comes from
their faucets. And considering that the government-supplied water
is typically high in unhealthy and nasty-tasting things like TDSs
and chlorine and bone-rotting fluoride, it is over-priced.
Speaking of "going thirsty"... the success of bottled water and
soft drinks is proof that people would rather go thirsty than
drink city water.
-------------------------





Reply via email to