On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 10:01:17PM -0700, Matt Tolton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Depending on the problem, you might indeed want "ev.h" there. You can
> > actually override how exactly ev.h is being included by providing the EV_H
> > macro.
>
> I do this, but it seems to me that for consistency it should be "ev.h"
> in ev++.h as it is in event.h.
Hmm, you are right, in my mind ev++.h was still a part of the app, but
since libev even installs it nowadays, "ev.h" is the only correct form.
--
The choice of a Deliantra, the free code+content MORPG
-----==- _GNU_ http://www.deliantra.net
----==-- _ generation
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\
_______________________________________________
libev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.schmorp.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libev
